this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
1277 points (91.5% liked)

Memes

45779 readers
2971 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] icedcoffee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly I was expecting more dogshit takes in the comments. Anyway everyone should read Elizabeth Anderson’s book “Private Government”

[–] TiKa444@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Even if the are more efficient, they earned the regarding profit for a small number of people, who has to much. For the society it is a loose loose. The services become more expensive and it lead to a redistribution of wealth from poor to rich, whitch is even worse for the society and the economy.

[–] biflip@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago
[–] SinJab0n@mujico.org 0 points 1 year ago

R u talking about musk?

How dare u!

[–] ghostblackout@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Look at spacex they are more efficient then nasa

[–] MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you base that on?

Spacex has had zero successful missions to Mars. NASA has landed 5 rovers.

[–] grayman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well one metric would be cost per kg to get something into space. I also recall a lot of people dying when NASA first started going into space, of which SpaceX has not had any rockets explode with people in them, but I'm not impaired enough to make that false equivalence like you did with Mars.

Of course my comment is false equivalence, because the initial assertion is false equivalence.

You can't compare NASA and Spacex because they have different goals. NASA even contract many of their payloads to Spacex, which they wouldn't do if they were in the same business.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

there's an exception to the rule

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›