this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)

United Kingdom

4108 readers
149 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I can see no downside to the state being able to track every transaction you make and devalue it at will, charge negative interest rates to encourage spending to boost 'the economy'. Read the research papers banks issue on this topic, the bankers are salivating.

Edit: typo

[–] Syldon 2 points 11 months ago

Charge negative interest rates? How do you think that will affect the banking sector.

[–] mannycalavera 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are you able to summarise the problems?

[–] Hossenfeffer 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Are you able to summarise the problems?

  1. "the state being able to track every transaction you make"
  2. "[the state being able to] devalue [a digital pound] at will"
  3. "[the state being able to] charge negative interest rates to encourage spending to boost ‘the economy’".

 

I hope that helps!

[–] Opafi@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] mannycalavera 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was hoping for a bit more than a general assertion of "bad things will happen" 🤷

[–] teft@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He listed three problems with it. I don’t see a general assertion of anything in his comment.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


MPs on the Treasury select committee said that while it was true that the rollout of a central bank digital currency could trigger fresh innovation and competition in the payments sector, serious questions remained about whether the positive effects outweighed the risks and costs.

The MPs said in a report they were worried that creating an electronic form of currency – held directly with the Bank of England rather than commercial lenders such as Barclays, NatWest or Santander – could pose risks to the UK’s financial stability without careful management.

“It must be clearly evidenced that a retail digital pound will provide benefits to the UK economy without increasing risks or leading to unmanageable costs before any decision is taken to introduce it into our financial system,” said the committee’s Conservative chair, Harriett Baldwin.

MPs said ministers also needed to “alleviate privacy concerns” that the government or third parties could misuse personal data, by either tracking or controlling how users spend their digital funds.

“While we support the Bank of England’s plan to continue working on the design of a potential retail digital pound, I would urge them to proceed with caution and maintain a genuinely open mind as to whether one is actually needed.”

The Bank and Treasury said in a joint statement that they welcomed the report and would respond in due course: “We will also shortly publish the response to our consultation paper setting out the next steps.


The original article contains 547 words, the summary contains 241 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!