this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

15 readers
2 users here now

A community for informative and interesting gaming content and discussions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a trip coming up, first plane ride in 10 years. I plan on taking my ROG Ally on the plane. Has anyone gamed (COD) through the planes Wifi before? How was it? Is it even possible ?What would should I expect?

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThatScottGuy@alien.top 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm in the in flight connectivity industry.

There are a few reasons why gaming isn't possible:

  1. Most systems are satellite based. We use geosynchronous (GEO) satellites that are 22.300 miles (36,000 Kilometers) above the equator which creates a lot of latency just getting your info from the plane, to the satellite, to the server, back to the satellite, then back to you. There is no way to avoid this. It could be reduced by using low earth orbit (LEO) or near earth orbit (NEO) satellites, which we are looking into, but latency would still be too high.
  2. Bandwidth limiting. Our current gen system can provide up to 60Mb to a plane under perfect conditions, so we have to limit bandwidth per person so a few people can't suck it all up
  3. The way the satellite system is designed. We use a hub (also called a star) system. The plane constantly receives an inbound signal (carrier) that has all the data to be sent to the users but the plane only transmits a carrier when it has data to send. If you want to watch a YouTube video, the plane pops up an out bound carrier saying it has data to send, the hub responds with the frequency and modulation setting to send the data, the plane transmits the data then drops the carrier so the next plane can use that space, and you get your video from the inbound carrier. This is done to save satellite bandwidth. If every customer on every plane has their own full time carrier, there would not be enough satellite bandwidth to accommodate it all.
  4. Terrestrial routing. It is not cost effective to have a data center located everywhere we have a satellite hub (we have a lot of the all over the world), so when your YouTube request reaches the hub, it is sent to the nearest data center then to the YouTube server and your video is sent back by the same path. This creates more latency.

We are always looking to improve our service but there is just too much latency in communicating over satellites that can not be avoided. I sincerely apologize to all gamers on behalf of the industry.

[–] DuctTape5119@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Apologize???

We are in a PLANE

20,000FT off the ground

Going 500MPH

AND WE CAN HAVE INTERNET!

33 years ago we could barely have internet in our own homes….

[–] Exciting_Session492@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Don’t, it is slow, and depending on the airline it will be expensive too.

Just play single player games.

[–] BionikViking@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Not worth it.

[–] shutyourbutt69@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I can tell you haven’t been on a plane in 10 years, plane wifi is just barely functional at the best of times in the best of conditions. You’d barely be able to browse the internet using a ROG Ally never mind attempting to play any internet-dependent games.

[–] FrobroX@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

You should expect to play a game offline.