this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)

Vegan

2966 readers
10 users here now

An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.

Rules and miscellaneous:

  1. We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
  2. No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
  3. Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
  4. Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
  5. All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“Eating dog meat cannot be a crime like trafficking drugs or prostitution,” Mr Joo told a radio news talk show, according to South China Morning Post.

About a week ago, when the South Korean government announced its plan to introduce a ban on dog meat, animal rights organisations celebrated the move across the world.

“With so many dogs needlessly suffering for a meat that hardly anyone eats, the government’s bill delivers a bold plan that must now urgently be passed by the assembly so that a legislative ban can be agreed as soon as possible to help South Korea close this miserable chapter in our history and embrace a dog-friendly future,” JungAh Chae, executive director of Humane Society International, said in a statement.

South Korea’s ruling conservative People Power Party has put forth a bill suggesting a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment or fines of 50 million won ($38,000; £30,333) for individuals engaging in the dog meat trade.

The liberal Democratic Party of Korea’s bill recommends three-year jail sentences and fines reaching up to 30 million won.

“If I have to close down, with the financial condition I’m in, there really is no answer to what I can do,” Lee Kyeong-sig, who runs a farm outside Seoul raising up to 1,100 dogs, told Reuters.


The original article contains 540 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Of course the crooks are making threats

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

"jobs tho!"

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I actually have no idea how to solve this issue. Maybe a government buy-back or something? I can see pig farmers doing the same thing if we ever succeeded on that front.

[–] teft@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Government buy back will cause a cobra effect.

[–] Simba@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Not if it's done one time.

The real issue then is what to do with 2 million dogs.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

No doubt the ban does not cover dogs that already exist.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 11 months ago

Combining with /u/darthsid@lemmy.world

Pay families to adopt one dog by giving them all the support they need to care for and love their rescue pet.

[–] darthsid@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Every family adopts a dog