this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10178 readers
540 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive Link from archive.today

Original Link from The New York Times

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nhgeek@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really can't wait until we stop hearing about Trump.

[–] GraceGH@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hate to say it, but I don't think that day will ever come. Even in death, his die-hards will be slinging conspiracy theories about how he was assassinated or how he was jesus and he'll ressurect soon to take on mega-hillary's doomsday army.

Hopefully we can at least confine it to its own section of the internet though.

[–] shadowolf@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Damn, that disturbingly possible

[–] nhgeek@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

It's an extremely pessimistic future you paint, but you are probably right.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I need to figure out how to create conspiracy theories that are crazier than Qanon. Trump shit on the constitution and did ALL those illegal things to EXPOSE the cracks on the system. He's MAGA one felony at a time. He took the pallets of classified files ON PURPOSE so he could sacrifice himself to start the fall of America and Armageddon. He's bringing Jesus BACK.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And brought before his good friend, Judge Aileen Cannon, who was “randomly assigned” to the case.

Sigh. He's going to get away with bloody murder again.

[–] Bones_17@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I'm getting a bit worried about Tuesday's arraignment, as he's pretty clearly calling for his cronies to show up to "support" him

[–] monsterlynn@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm so over this game show host.

Why did anyone ever give a fuck about this guy?

He was a bottom of the barrel choice for a gameshow and was super lucky to get the Apprentice.

Any fuckstick could've taken that role and run with it

[–] Kinbladez@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Hey now. Calling him a game show host is diminishing his filmography significantly. He was also an extra in Home Alone 2.

[–] FoolishBrainiac@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

The Apprentice did more to convince people he was a brilliant businessman than his work in business ever did.

[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

It's important to remember at this point that being bad at crime is not a valid defense.

If you mug a guy and immediately drop the wallet down a storm drain, you've still committed robbery. If you steal a car but lock the keys in it, it's still theft. If you attempt to overthrow your own government and can't organize people to actually pull it off, you've still committed treason.

Trump, despite being a career criminal, is still really shit at being a criminal. Some people will construe his failure to execute with innocence - it is not. It's incompetence.

[–] darkknight@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Let me know when he goes to jail.

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Listening to Youtube, Beau of the Fifth Column, he says the Federal court he's in now in Florida has a 92-94% conviction rate.

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

+1 for the Beau of the Fifth Column shoutout. If his listeners are here then I know I'm among good people.

[–] Stormyfemme@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Right? We've been hearing about how it'll happen any day now for uh...6 years?

This. Pretty much as soon as he starting running for president there has been talk about illegal operations and trials. But nothing has ever come of it. Even if there's a 98% chance, I'll only really care once a sentence is handed out.

[–] patchymoose@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

It really feels like we, as a country, are being dragged towards an ugly 2024 crescendo of the Trump era. This espionage case is going to coincide with the 2024 election.

[–] nodester@partizle.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The irony is that he is the one who signed a law making mishandling classified documents a felony.

[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

This was too good to believe so I had to fact-check it. It's true.

[–] starrox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, with all the shit this disgusting wannabe dictator has already gotten away with, I'll hold on to celebrations until there is some kind of definitive verdict.

And dont get me started on the sentence even IF they convict him for something. He's old, he's rich, he probably still has some buddies in higher places - I'd be absolutely surprised if he would go to a genpop prison. - Even though thats exactly what he would deserve the most.

I'm cautiously hopeful. I didn't expect him to be indicted in the first place.

[–] zhunk@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Charging him is still a big milestone, and setting the precedent that a former president can be charged is still important. But, yeah, sentencing will be the even bigger milestone.

[–] starrox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

undefined> setting the precedent that a former president can be charged is still important

absolutely. It is already a win, but I believe the US really need the BIG win which would be to actually sentence him for the serious crimes he commited. Literally every other US citizen would be a prisoner long since for doing a microscopic part of what Trump did. The damage that one person did in 4 years, and not just locally in America but also internationally, is sheer unbelievable.

[–] thilo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sadly this is not Trumps achievement, but the rising hostility of a collapsing ecology coupled with late stage capitalism (read survival-of-the-fittest-mentality). We don't talk much about it but most people dying in the climate crisis wont die of heatstroke but by wars. It is a struggle to keep your humanity in the process. Sadly there are an increasing number of people who stop bothering.

/edit grammar

[–] starrox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You say a lot of sad truths there.

Of course it is not Trumps responsibility that our planet goes to shit. That people get more alienated from each other in general. That hate and fear spread like wildfires while empathy and humanity is in short supply.

But what IS Trumps accomplishment is that he is responsible for giving all those hateful, ignorant people a voice. He normalized saying shit that you'd only dared to share in the company of a few close friends in the past. He normalized the complete lack of empathy towards adversaries. He normalized acting like a complete moron against all evidence. He normalized distrust in science. He normalized abusing a political responsibility for selfpromotion. ... I could go on.

But what is really grinding my gears behind that context is, that he normalized all that shit not only in the US, but basically worldwide due to the insane reach he had as US president. Parties in my home country are beginning to do exactly the same shit, not on full-removed level yet but we will get there.

/rant sorry

[–] Clbull@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This and Boris Johnson resigning makes my dick hard.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Can we try not to unnecessarily sexualize this? Too much of this and we'll end up a reddit/twitter clone where people are just aiming for quick/easy zingers

[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Looking at this as non-partisan as I can... if Hillary wasn't convicted for essentially doing the exact same thing (and deleting the evidence...) then I really don't see any way for Trump to be convicted either.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No evidence of Clinton's alleged misconduct was found. Plenty of evidence of Trump's was found. That's the difference.

Maybe it's because Clinton is innocent. Maybe it's because she did a better job covering her tracks. Who knows? Regardless, you need evidence to convict someone, and I hope I speak for us all when I say the alternative is much, much worse.

[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

She willingly hid classified documents on a private server and wiped it with BeachBit so investigators couldn’t recover the evidence. Arguably that’s worse since she could also be charged with destruction of evidence. Come on now… either BOTH Hillary and Trump should be in prison or neither of them should be in prison. Any other interpretation is being willfully partisan.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Arguably that’s worse since she could also be charged with destruction of evidence.

but like. she wasn't. she was investigated extensively--and that investigation probably cost her the presidency insofar as any singular thing can be blamed for her loss--and she wasn't. do you have a reasonable explanation for why she'd not be charged with these things if she was actually as damned as you're suggesting?

[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the FBI is very clearly politically motivated.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i'm... sure you recognize that this is quite literally a case where the facts disagree with your personal feelings. i also i don't really know where we can go from here if your earnest belief is the FBI was "politically motivated" into clearing Hillary Clinton when it literally said her actions did not rise to the standard of criminality and again, their investigation may be the single biggest reasons she lost the presidency.

[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Please explain to me how hiding classified documents on a private server with the intent of shielding yourself from oversight and then deleting the evidence when investigators close in NOT enough to rise to the standard of criminality? Seriously, I’m so sick of every online forum being dominated by partisan-talking points. It’s abundantly clear that BOTH OF THEM BROKE THE LAW AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED. However the justice system is 100% broken when rules are applied unevenly. And our entire system is broken when partisan political figures actually cheer the rules being applied unevenly.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Seriously, I’m so sick of every online forum being dominated by partisan-talking points. It’s abundantly clear that BOTH OF THEM BROKE THE LAW AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED.

this is a good sign this won't go anywhere productive, because your conclusion here can really only follow from the premise that the FBI got it wrong and there is simply no evidence that they did. it is not a partisan talking point to say this--and ironically, what you're saying is. do you earnestly believe that you are in a better position to assess criminality here than the literal, actual Federal Bureau of Investigation, who spent a full year investigating whether a crime was committed? or better than the Trump-era Inspector General of the Department of Justice, who was critical of Comey's public handling of the investigation but found no bias in the investigation's course in either direction? if so then i can't stop you from believing that, but nobody should take your position seriously and there's no sense in debating it. you'd be arguing from a position grounded by nothing at that point.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

hiding classified documents on a private server with the intent of shielding yourself from oversight and then deleting the evidence when investigators close in

Prove it or it didn't happen.

Seriously, I’m so sick of every online forum being dominated by partisan-talking points.

My partner in pasta, you are trying to dominate this forum with partisan talking points!

[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you disputing that Hillary put classified documents on a private server? A statement that Comey literally said happened during his speech a few days before the election? And saying that both Trump and Clinton should be in prison is a partisan talking point in your world? Partisan to which party, may I ask? Jesus Christ.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you disputing that Hillary put classified documents on a private server?

Yes. Prove it or it didn't happen.

A statement that Comey literally said happened during his speech a few days before the election?

I'm aware. That is not proof.

And saying that both Trump and Clinton should be in prison is a partisan talking point in your world?

Yes, because by “both Trump and Clinton” you actually mean “just Clinton” and it's not fooling anyone.

[–] nicholas@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ah so you’re just a left-wing partisan conspiracy theorist. Considering neither Comey and Clinton (or literally anyone except for you) dispute the fact that she had classified information on her server.

Or you’re a troll. Which is probably the case.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah so you’re just a left-wing partisan conspiracy theorist.

You're the one making wild, unsubstantiated accusations, not me.

Considering neither Comey and Clinton (or literally anyone except for you) dispute the fact that she had classified information on her server.

More accusations will not sway me. Only proof will.

[–] HQC@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

What level of investigation that doesn't end up charging Clinton with a crime would you accept?

[–] HQC@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Why are even we talking about someone that was never President, is not running for President, and is not currently serving in public office?

Investigate and prosecute all criminals. That includes Trump, regardless of who else it also includes.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

You're making some very serious accusations there. Before we proceed, I'm going to need to see some equally serious proof.

[–] Kinbladez@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What she did is not at all "essentially doing the exact same thing". At all. I'm not saying she's not probably guilty of some crime at some point because most of our politicians are corrupt, but you are absolutely misinformed if you think she kept hundreds of classified documents, showed them off to people, and lied to federal investigators about it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HQC@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

She did not do "essentially the same thing" for multiple reasons.

  • The emails you're referring to were not classified and went through proper process to get permission to be removed.
  • Hillary has already been investigated and cleared, including investigations conducted by the Trump administration.
  • Trump was given multiple opportunities to return documents. He kept lying and keeping things even after saying they'd returned everything. There are still classified docs that haven't been found!
  • The nature of the material is orders of magnitude different. Nothing that Hillary has been accused of destroying or storing improperly, even if those accusations were all true, even begins to compare to the sensitivity and importance of the kind of information Trump was hoarding.
  • In addition to simply possessing the material he shouldn't and refusing to give it back, he also breached security by showing sensitive information to people that weren't allowed and, just at a practical level, has no reasonable need to see it in the first place.
load more comments
view more: next ›