this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
105 points (99.1% liked)

GenZedong

4298 readers
114 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Um, I am not sure how I feel about this. Why would Xi support a two-state solution? Isn't it more justified to have a one-state solution and return all of the land to the Palestinians? Won't a two-state solution eventually lead us back to another genocide? This feels off. I did not expect Xi to make such a statement.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qwename@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

A one-state solution for Palestine will still result in conflict between Palestinians and Israelis, the current Israeli colonialism in Palestine will just turn into Israeli separatism from a single Palestinian state.

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Are you implying that Israelis cannot every make peace with Palestinians? That they are fundamentally incapable of such a thing?

I'm beating around the bush here, but you're getting very close to a lot of very antisemitic arguments for Israel's existence.

[–] SadArtemis@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 11 months ago

I would argue it is nigh incapable of Israel (or its state apparatus and the majority of its population) to make peace with Palestinians. Not because they are Jewish, but because it is the nature of settler-colonialism.

One could point at the Anglo settler-states claiming they show there's a step forward- but what justice has been done there, for the native peoples? I live in Canada, I was raised mostly rural, many of my childhood friends, classmates were indigenous and they all were being raised by white, Christian families. If you think there's any justice- hell, any equality here, I got a bridge to sell you...

There is only one answer to settler-colonialism- indigenism. It doesn't require the driving out of all settlers (though I won't claim I'd shed many tears about it if it did). It's the answer in Bolivia, it's the answer in South Africa, it's the answer in Algeria, etc... while NZ is far from perfect to my understanding, some degree of it is in employ there, as well.

There is no place for a white, Jewish ethnostate imposing itself in the rightful land of the Palestinians, and the settler mentality is aware of that- so long as the Palestinian people exist in any meaningful sense, peace with the ethnostate is a pipe dream. There's a place, perhaps, for a state that comprises both the indigenous Palestinians and the settler Jewish peoples- but Israel? I don't believe that, just as there was no place for the Pied-Noirs to have their state, there was no place for the Rhodesians to have their state, there was no place for the Apartheid government and Boer minority rule to continue.

China toeing the UN line- the pragmatic approach- is sensible. I'd toe it too, if I were in any position to do so. But inevitably, IMO- so long as the apartheid-state exists, so long as the state built upon the ideals of white supremacy and the destruction or suppression of the indigenous peoples, and the sole benefit of the settler-colonials exists, the Israelis will show their true colors, time and time again. Not because they're Jewish, but because they're colonials clinging to a colonial ideal, who have not faced justice or equality, and this is what colonials do. Eventually the Anglo settler states no doubt (IMO) will have to face their own reckoning, it may not be indigenism in the truest sense (as the native peoples aren't demographically relevant enough) but it will be a reckoning of the white, imperialist state, especially as the white demographics continue to decline.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 420stalin69@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

I think Israel can keep Tel Aviv sure why not

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

2 Pal 2 Estine: Levant Drift

[–] Yeat@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

didn’t china send some military aid to israel?

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I saw something like that on Twitter but it was from a suspicious account with no official (i.e government or media) standing. Just a pic of boxes at an airport that were purportedly full of body armor. Could have been literally anything.

[–] Yeat@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

yeah i saw something similar you might be onto something

[–] jabrd@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They’re just going to follow America’s lead on this huh? I guess China wouldn’t be tied into the situation in a way they’d be able to realistically pursue a peace plan the way Xi could with Putin during the Ukraine war. Wild but I guess those carrier groups really do dissuade foreign intervention

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 11 months ago

it isn't; regardless of its rhetoric, Amerika wants a one-state "solution" without Palestinians, whereas China wants some kind of peace

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›