this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
10 points (85.7% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3884 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I support eliminating billionaires.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

why republicans always find a way to deny voting for some random group?

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why report on that guy's opinions as if they matter? He's rich, not a voting rights expert.

He's a fascist, too, which people conveniently ignore because he's rich and some of it might rub off on them.

[–] MrCrowBard@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

For the same reason the opinion of someone like Rupert Murdoch matters. Its not about their viewpoint directly as an individual, its the fact they control massive platforms that can and do sway public opinions.

In murdochs case he's had an influential impact on British politics over the last 40 years and has used his media empire to act as a king maker.

Musk isn't as savvy or as intelligent as Murdoch but that doesn't mean is influential position should be ignored.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Welcome to the rise of aggressively pro-natalism billionaires, because it's 2023 and we're not imploding fast enough.

Remember, you won't have a seat on the transport to Mars. And if you ever get there, it will be to work the mines.

[–] GroggyKon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like these people are using the Handmaids Tale as a guide at this point...

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do republicans hate freedom so much?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zefiax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People forget a huge side of this as well. It's not just being financial able to have kids but physically able. More and more people now days are seeking fertility treatment and having fertility issues. According to elon, those people would not have the right to vote.

[–] zgasma@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I support 100% tax over $1 billion. If you can't manage on a billion dollars, the rest would be better spent on others, anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s amazing he’s had sex 10 times. I don’t get what’s attractive about him in any form.

[–] xc2215x@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I support eating the rich; one bite at a time.

[–] telllos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In french a bite is a.., well this sentence is funny to me.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about we stop caring what that clown has to say?

I find it especially egregious the people who (rightfully) bash him, but continue to support his products such as Twitter and Tesla. Stop supporting him. Especially on Twitter. Advertisers have fled the platform. Some users have as well. If even 1/2 the people who claim to hate the guy just stopped using Twitter, the entire platform would collapse. Instead you people prop up that site by going to it.

[–] Kleinbonum@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People whine about how shitty the API has become and how shitty tech support is and how there's no one to talk to when they run into bugs - yet they keep paying Musk $42,000 a month for that privilege.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what in the starship-troopers-ass fuck is this troll shit

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

FrEe SpEeCh

[–] SoPunny@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Talk about unalienable rights to life and liberty

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] sci@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happened to free speech absolutist

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

What happened to free speech absolutist

It turns out he's a disingenuous shit-bag. But you didn't need me to tell you that.

[–] PhoenxBlue@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Is this guy literally having a psychosis?

His actions lately (I say lately, loosely) have been absolutely batshit bonkers.

I'm enjoying the show none the less

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I disagree with his fundamental premise that people with children can see the interests of society better.

I don't have children, but I have heard from every possible source that once you have children they become your world.

How is a person expected to reason clearly about the interest of millions of people when they are running an ancient biological program focused on the interests of a tiny family unit?

edit: I once saw the argument that having family doens't make you a better person. Having family makes you a ruthless user and taker on behalf of your family. Most of the stories you hear of people giving in to corruption, happen because those people can't afford to lose their jobs, because they have mouths to feed. Once you have kids, you must choose whether you value your kids over your civic responsibility, or vice-versa.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People with children won't have the time to research issues too deeply, and they will be sleep deprived for several years.

They make better sheep.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›