this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
747 points (100.0% liked)

196

16574 readers
2216 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roastpotatothief@lemmy.ml 208 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It is useful to have lots of stupid laws. It makes people feel powerless and frustrated. It means the police can always find excuses to persecute you.

The technicalities of the individual laws are not important. It's the psychological effect of the whole body of laws on a people.

[–] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The US does the same thing. People need to push back. Hard.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is useful to have lots of stupid laws. It makes people feel powerless and frustrated. It means the police can always find excuses to persecute you.

How many laws does the US have again?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 29 points 1 year ago

Nothing in his comment says that the US is not an example of this strategy 🤔

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well an estimate from 2008 put it at upwards of 4,000 just as federal crimes. Not to even touch on state matters ,tax, civil affronts, etc.

[–] rchive@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

If we don't know the exact number, then it's too high. Lol

[–] cam_i_am@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
  • me, complaining about the Acceptable Use Policy I had to sign at work.
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Given the context, this seems more evil than is probably intended.

There are laws about collection and storage of rainwater all over the world unrelated to genocide. Water falling from the sky is the source of aquifers, lakes, and rivers that are important for everyone.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

The problem here is that the Palestine people aren’t being given control of their water.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 year ago

Yeah there are good reasons to limit or prevent rainwater collection in order to preserve necessary river systems or agricultural areas etc.

However I highly highly doubt anything good faith is going on here.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago

The context is very straightfoward. It is an occupied territory. The occupier claims ownership of natural ressources in the occupied territory. This is typical imperialist behaviour and illegal under international law.

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/QZkSRlIs9o0?si=l7jYk8g92oIS4t3b

The evil part is having laws like this and then filling in their water sources with concrete.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/QZkSRlIs9o0?si=l7jYk8g92oIS4t3b

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] BautAufWasEuchAufbaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To add what others said (like Israel making up rules for Palestine), the people of Palestine are being attacked and their infrastructure targeted. It is pretty evil to destroy the water supply and then say: "but you can't get it elsewhere :)".
I don't think this is necessarily the case here, but laws like this are often an attempt to offer the appearance of legitimacy to acts of violence (i.e. "yes we imprisoned them but they broke the law!").

[–] riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago

and who better to claim ownership over the rain falling on palastinian soil than the israeli government

i dont think you can justify this stuff, at best make it sound slightly less evil

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Water for agricultural and domnestic use usually is fed back to the water cycle, though.

Watering my veggies is distinct from e.g. building a dam, or something.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You could, though, for example, set up a large collection system for water that would normally be fed into a tributary that other farmers are using downstream for irrigation. A company with enough resources to collect and bottle rainwater for profit across a large area that would otherwise feed into aquifers could bleed a small farming community dry.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AFAIK, there is no such laws in Europe. I know for parts of USA and Israel. Correct me if I am wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are laws about collection and storage of rainwater all over the world unrelated to genocide.

I never seen them before. Too much rainwater is a problem, but not collecting it.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

It's illegal for me to have rain barrels off my gutters. I wanted them to use the water for my garden. I'm not in any area with existing water shortage or drought issues either.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It can be actually. People upstream of water sources - often wealthy people with land but sometimes a collective of local farmers - build dams or retaining ponds to save the water for themselves and on a significant scale can limit the amount of water that goes downstream.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Oh I think it’s meant to be just as evil as it looks.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It makes more sense to limit the amount of water collected than to outright banning it tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't even... how do you prevent that?

[–] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 1 year ago

Guns and bombs usually do the trick

[–] Leyla@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's the usual way of stopping someone from collecting rain water?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Fines/violence, usually.

It's actually not uncommon to have laws that restrict gathering rain water in many places. Lots of US states do as well. If water is collected locally on a mass scale, it messes with water tables/rivers/lakes/etc.

Forbidding it when a place doesnt have otherwise dependable water infastructure is inhuman however.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I imagine the ban on rainwater collection is from before the war, and I imagine there are similar laws in Israel.

There’s lots to be mad at the Israelis for doing. We don’t need to make things up. This article on water in Gaza makes a good point:

A graphic representation of the unfair restrictions is that while many Jewish settlements have swimming pools, Palestinians in “Area C” of the West Bank are not allowed cisterns for collecting rainwater.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Killing them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Rain is the property…”

Wow.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The United States does the same thing all over the Southwest. Rural people will tell you.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It might be the same as Canada where you only can with a permit just to be sure people aren't drinking mold water

[–] MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'd guess it's for droughts

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

There's a difference between needing a permit to collect rainwater because the water belongs to everyone, and being forbidden from collecting rainwater because the water belongs to an oppressing party.

[–] SpunkyMcGoo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

isn't the point there that shit is super dry and if you leech the water in the wrong places the ground can't handle it?

[–] 7u5k3n@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's illegal in some states as well.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I remember learning about this while having This Old House playing in the background.

Here's a map of the regulations for each state (currently the heaviest looks like it is restricted by volume and/or medium of collection) https://www.energy.gov/femp/rainwater-harvesting-regulations-map

[–] 8000mark@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Hamas has banned the digging of wells since 2021. I don't see how they would permit the harvesting of rainwater, even if there weren't Israeli legal regulations in place (which seem to be on par with many other countries' laws). That plus their systematic dismantling of working water infrastructure for rocket parts has had it's effects.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But hamas collect the water and then make bombs to attack for no specific reason.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Water bombs. They launch kegs full of water to bankrupt Israel water companies.

[–] Leyla@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Should have added /s at the end. [Differentiating intentions is really hard these days]

[–] igorgama@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

What is water? H2O. What does the H stand for? Hydrogen. Ever heard of hydrogen bombs?

Still think Hamas (which is all Palestinians, UN officials, and doctors in hospitals, obviously) just want water do "drink" and "not die of dehydration"?

[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Great source! Phrased differently - can't build a cistern without a permit - but they are certainly painted as right a-holes about it. Thanks for the source!

[–] SVcross@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›