this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16855 readers
53 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/6008113

This will disable many popular extensions for example uBlock Orgin

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

can they please just like... don't?

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what happens in a quasi monopoly. They would suffer no consequences from it and the others like Mozilla would just have to follow along.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mozilla will want to be API-compatible, but there's nothing inherent to the API that requires the arbitrary content-blocking limitation that Google put in. So, Mozilla will be API-compatible without adopting this shitty limitation.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Knusper@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting, I didn't know that, but it doesn't really change anything about my comment. Mozilla can offer APIs in addition to what Manifest v3 offers, allowing extensions that want to do these things to do them. It's already the case today, for example, that uBlock Origin makes use of additional APIs for more effective ad blocking on Firefox.

[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Seems like something they can't stop pushing because ... reasons.

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would they want to stop? This is their fight against adblockers and on Chromium based browsers it's an effective way so of course they keep pushing. ;)

[–] RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I don't want to hear the realistic argumentation of why this is proceeding. I want to live in my fantasy headspace where comments like this can stop superpower megacorps from being assholes....okay? 😅

[–] privacybro@lemmy.ninja 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

can someone refresh me on why exactly migrating to manifest v3 is bad?

[–] moonwalker@infosec.exchange 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox looking better for 2024

[–] moonwalker@infosec.exchange 1 points 1 year ago

@ericjmorey yup. at least they give a shit

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Google has also started delaying the approval of revisions of privacy-related addons. This is an all out war against user privacy. Everyone, please stop using or promoting this Trojan malware called chrome or anything based on it.

[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Most people aren't going to know or care, but getting the word out that Firefox allows better, more useful extensions due to recent changes by Alphabet will make a difference.

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's true that most people won't know or care. But the only ones who can make a difference are the ones who understand the situation. We shouldn't assume that nobody will listen to us. If we tell a hundred people, perhaps 5 will listen - and even that's a pessimistic assumption. Even such small changes add up in the long run. The last nail on the coffin of our freedom will be the silence of those with the wisdom to recognize its erosion.

[–] ericjmorey@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

People will definitely listen if the experience is better because of the extensions.