this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
220 points (96.6% liked)

Games

16697 readers
764 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 89 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But you released a paid game without performance to your standards? Weird.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The developers are mostly blameless, Paradox forced the premature launch.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Paradox as a publisher seems to pull this shit a lot. Was really looking forward to Lamplighter's League, but the buggy mess that it released in shows very clearly that Paradox shoved it out the door before QA had some serious time with it.

They don't do this shit with their in-house games, seems to be an issue with them as a publisher.

I'm glad it's not just me. Gave LLL an honest try last weekend and couldn't be bothered to play more than an hour and a half.

Felt barebones and the story was not captivating

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My train platforms being filled with dogs was kind of a hilarious bug, though it's being patched next update.

[–] rem26_art@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

hey maybe those dogs have places to go lol

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

As long as they pay the fare

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe this was a shout out to Moscow’s Metro Dogs

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

That's reserved for the Zootopia dlc

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think they lowered the rate where dogs become strays

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

How generous...

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not sure if I trust paradox to let them. Stellaris still runs like shit.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stellaris is also almost 10 years old with an engine that is, by admission of the devs, coded into a dead end. They customized an older version of it too much and now they can't get the performance improvements from the newer engine versions into the game.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't need a new engine, they need to stop calculating every pop every day and start using events to trigger a calculation. E.g. a species modification or changing buildings on a planet.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you're saying they might not need a new engine and all they have to do is rewrite half of the old one?

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think they'd have to rewrite half. Just the main population update loop. The graphics performance is fine.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stellaris is like one of the most simulation heavy 4X games there is. There's a limit to how good performance you can get when you're making a complex simulation like that.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree, but they've promised performance fixes since like 2018 but never actually put any effort into it.

[–] LeberechtReinhold@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats not true at all, there has been incredible improve, particularly with jobs.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Around when? I gave up on waiting in 2021. They promised huge performance increases every year from 17-21 but it got worse with each dlc.

If they actually fixed it then I would love to come back. I miss Stellaris

[–] LeberechtReinhold@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

3.0 and 3.3 were big on optimization iirc.

They also moved to the custodian system which makes stellaris easily the most polished and stable of all of Paradox games

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just blatantly false. We've even had dev diaries showing they've fixed some performance issues, even showing the performance graphs to prove it.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

When? I gave up in 2021.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't played Stellaria in a while, but I don't remember the performance being bad. If it is it's not because of any graphical thing that can be improved, but for the same reason Dwarf Fortress runs like shit, i.e. there's a limit to your CPU power when simulating hundreds of individuals.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with Stellaris is that they simulate every individual even if nothing changed about them. If nothing changes on a planet or species then they shouldn't recalculate employed pops.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How would you know if nothing changed unless you're simulating them?

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Easy, event driven updates. Populations would all have a flag "should_update" which defaults to false.

When a population update event occurs, like constructing a building on a planet, you mark should_update for all the pops on that planet to be reevaluated.

Unemployed pops would have should_update until they are employed.

Changing a species would should_update for every pop that got gene modded.

Then every day you only run updates for pops with should_update set to true instead of every pop in the galaxy.

Late game performance would be on par with early game because a lot of planets have been forgotten about

In order to reshuffle pops to make sure they're in the best jobs, there could be a timer per planet, based on things like the size of the planet, time since last migration, etc to trigger a should_update for the whole planet.

It'd be even better to just trigger the updates during the event and completely get rid of the polling loop, but that would require a lot more work in the paradox engine

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's literally what the game already does. But it can't have all the effects you believe it should have, because there are a lot of events that can change a modifier that would require a recalculation.

Also marking thing as "should_update" (like you called it here) the way you describe it would cause terrible performance issues. You can't mark large amount of pops for an employment update, because employment calculations are some of the more expensive ones to do, and doing it for large amounts of individual pops at a time would cause severe lag spikes.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh they finally added that? Nice. The community has been asking for event driven since 2019 so it's nice to know they added it. I'm gonna reinstall

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was always in there, but the degree of optimization varied of course.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

When the community researched the issue back in 21 it definitely seemed like there wasn't any optimization because the monthly load was consistent and the major slowdowns appeared around pop job computing.

We may have been wrong because we were using profilers and decomps, which can lead to bad assumptions, but that's what we saw.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like I said I haven't played Stellaris in a while and never got into modding it so I'm not sure how the engine works, so correct me if I'm wrong. It's my understanding that pops have a "life", i.e. they get educated, they develop traits, they join factions, etc. those are not things that can be simulated only when something changes on a planet, otherwise crime/unrest would never change on a planet, traits wouldn't be added/removed and factions wouldn't grow/shrink or have demands unless you do something on that planet. Also there's the migration from one planet to another, and the growth of pops and several other things that have to be simulated all the time and can't be triggered by an event since they're slow growing (and the slow growth is the simulation that happens every frame). Also, even on late game there should be probably a few thousand pops in the entire galaxy, right? If most of the time nothing was happening that would be a very fast loop, the fact that it's not should be evidence that there is some calculation happening for every pop at every frame, because while you're correct that an event system is much better for large amounts of data points, a few thousand is not that big, which is to say that a loop that checks all of these conditions and only does something heavy when one of them is true should not be as slow as you're describing, sure it's not optimal, but should only become a problem when you get to several million pops.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You are correct. When the community researched the issue we found it was mainly the jobs causing the slow down though.

The research may have been wrong because we were mostly using profiling tools and inspecting the memory, but that's what we found.

It was especially bad when the ai was allowed to gene mod because the ai likes to make a lot of species.

[–] Zellith@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CrazyEddie041@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Colossi fix it.

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Reminder that their standards are apparently 30 FPS.

[–] spacesatan@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

it's a city builder. like 90%+ of the player base would rather have 20-30 fps now rather than 60 fps in 3 months.

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Cinematic standards.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 10 points 1 year ago

They should put performance fixes as a dlc and sell it. True capitalism.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about this. Take all the features from SC1 DLCs and put them in vanilla SC2 and release it as a fully complete game.

Oh who the hell am I kidding, it's Paradox. The only more DLC greedy game companies are EA and whoever makes Train Simulator.

[–] Katzastrophe@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

Hey, the Sims 4 modders, who use free 3d models to create badly made furniture mods, just to sell them for $20-30 on Patreon want to have a word with you

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Shouldn't have released the GAME before it was up to your standards.......

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It feels like Paradox made them release the game too early and now Colossal Order is trying to pick up the pieces