this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22023 readers
67 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US supreme court has ruled that Native American children can continue to be protected under federal law against being removed from their tribal communities for fostering or adoption, rejecting a petition from a white couple who argued that the provision was a form of racial discrimination.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ConstableJelly@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"The plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case, Jennifer and Chad Brackeen, are a white couple living in Texas who want to adopt a now 4-year-old girl whose birth mother is Navajo. The couple had already adopted the girl’s brother, who shares the same birth mother, and when the girl was born in 2018 and fostered by another family, the couple filed for custody of her, too.

But ICWA establishes that children in foster care who are eligible for tribal membership should be placed with extended family, another member of their tribe or another Native American family whenever possible. And a relative — a great-aunt who lives in the Navajo Nation in Arizona and visits regularly with the children’s older siblings — also wants to adopt the girl."

I'm sad for the children caught in the middle of this fight, though I doubt their case is unique. But trying to tank the entire ICWA, which would have apparently opened the door to question other sovereign rights of indigenous tribes, is such a gross overextension. Glad to hear this news.

https://religionnews.com/2022/11/09/religion-plays-a-role-in-native-american-adoption-case-before-supreme-court/

[–] Lost_Wanderer@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is unexpectedly good news

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. I think it's more important that a child be placed with a loving family rather than that they be placed with someone that happens to share a lot of genes or a cultural heritage with their ancestors, and this court case says that those latter factors can override the former. It's complicated.

[–] Bricriu@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If I understand correctly, the opinion explicitly focuses on Indian tribes as nations -- i.e. legal entities -- not races.

[–] Lost_Wanderer@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago
[–] IntlLawGnome@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gorsuch is a mixed bag at best on a lot of issues, but he has been as good as anyone could expect on Indigenous issues. Check out his concurrence in this case (starting on PDF page 43), which straightforwardly grapples with the history of forced family separations and residential schools.

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It absolutely sucks that we have to rely on landing two out of three from Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch to get anything like a humane decision out of this court, but given the presidents who appointed them, I guess it could be worse?

[–] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Extremely rare SC W

load more comments
view more: next ›