this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
183 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

59204 readers
3707 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrikoX@vlemmy.net 139 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Obviously. It's linked to Instagram, so it's gonna be a another playground for "influencers" to milk their fans.

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

One more reason not to federate with them.

[–] burrp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This strategy sounds perfect: ensuring Threads isn't the destination of choice for serious discussion. Thanks for sentencing your new product to death, Adam.

[–] wh3resmym1nd@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah! A great way instantly destroy the value of it for a bunch of Twitter subcultures like Politicians, Journalists, Media outlets in general.

Like, what's the point of this app and the launch window if you're instantly going to turn off lots of prominent users?

Sidenote: I would not trust Meta at all regarding ads and politics, we've seen in the last five years on why not.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course not it's to collect all your data as much as possible and sell to the highest bidder. Wonder Meta hasn't bought out one of those ancestry companies so they can start collecting people physical data along with their digital.

Be pretty simple force them to have a Facebook account and or Threads and man the data they could get.

Because basically its what they want with their terms of use.

[–] peetabix@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Wonder Meta hasn't bought out one of those ancestry companies so they can start collecting people physical data along with their digital."

Shhhh...don't give them any ideas.

[–] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I swear if they really wanted to, they could do that and build a database on par with federal government departments.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Make it open source and searchable, and they could fuck up society.

[–] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Just pull another Cambridge Analytica with it and watch the world burn. The shady siphoning of data for years until the secret leaks would skyrocket everyone's anxiety about who had what and questioning everything around them all while conspiracies spiral out of control. If it were searchable at least you'd know, but this way the unknown would be so much worse.

Have fun with that mental image.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 35 points 1 year ago

People whose entire existence is inherently political: "oh great."

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only mindless drivel is allowed here on Threads. Please continue consuming and not thinking.

[–] meggied90@vlemmy.net 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It feels like if Twitter and LinkedIn had a baby, it would be Threads.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] wh3resmym1nd@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Wow, didn't think of that! Yeah, feels like that. Worst of both worlds.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Make no mistake threads will still be political. It's not like they're gonna start banning people for linking CNN articles.

But I bet dollars to donuts when they do ban people for whatever they consider 'too much' it's not gonna come down failry will it?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Instagram’s new Threads app is “not going to do anything to encourage” politics and “hard news,” Instagram boss Adam Mosseri said in a Threads conversation with The Verge’s Alex Heath.

...

The Instagram boss later clarified his initial response, stating that while Threads won’t “discourage or down-rank news or politics,” it won’t “court” them as Facebook has in the past. “If we are honest, we were too quick to promise too much to the industry on Facebook in the early 2010s, and it would be a mistake to repeat that,” Mosseri said.

Step 1: "If we just ignore the 800 pound gorilla in the room it will go away, so anyone discussing the gorilla will be banned."

Step 2: "Nobody could have known there was an 800 pound gorilla running around breaking people's arms! To better protect our customers we've seized control of everyone's arms. [High fives all around]."

[–] Mereo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what exactly is it for? To have superficial conversations about how tasty their food was? Then it won't work. All meaningful conversation is inherently political. We just need a good platform where parties can talk to each other with respect.

[–] OldFartPhil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was posted yesterday, but definitely should be in this thread, as well: Facebook's Threads is so depressing

[–] wh3resmym1nd@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I really love that the post is called, "Facebook's Threads". I really hate the rename to Meta, because all it is, is just a smart rebrand to swindle the mainstream users into trusting them.

Disgusting.

[–] sabriy01@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

For creating propaganda and extremist subcultures. Hell, I've seen how groups like LibsOfTikTok and MothersForLiberty already spearheading the charge exactly for what Threads wants for this sludge of a platform. And the federation with the Fediverse is just tons of inhuman refuse waiting to pour in

load more comments
view more: next ›