this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
549 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59756 readers
3314 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Honda says making cheap electric vehicles is too hard, ends deal with GM::The platform was to use GM's Ultium batteries.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 144 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

So, like all the others, while China will produce cheap eCars. Look, I don't want to predict the future, but if I only have 20-30k for a new car, I simply physically can't buy a 60k SUV. You can't jump into a saturated market of other car companies, who almost all seam to want only expensive eCars and expect a good outcome. There's only so much money in the pockets of people and only so much people are willing to pay for a used eCar, if it needs expensive battery replacement soon. Not going to happen. Build cheaper cars or fail.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 41 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Not to mention not everyone has a garage or nearby charging spot to charge an ev.

Perhaps dealing with infrastructure first would be interesting...

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then again, I don't have a gas station in my backyard either...

Shopping centers/grocery stores need more charging stations, that's the most realistic place to go to charge when you don't have the capacity to do it at home.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Workplaces too.

I cannot even charge my phone at work under Italian law (I'm a public employee and it would count as malversation).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (26 children)

The issue is charging takes a while, while refuelling is pretty much instantaneous

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope to see more cheap cars by 2025 when VW starts doing their id1 and id2. The rest of the manufacturers need to follow suit or lose out of the massive market for mini and micros.

Personally I did get a used EV. It had driven less than 200km in total, but I got it at about 70% of the normal price. The battery is fine. The used market isn't just for worn out cars. People sell almost new cars for a variety of reasons, so it's worth looking at the used market already. The batteries in modern cars are generally better than their reputation. I wouldn't want to get a 7-10 year old EV, but anything newer is just fine.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Used / 200km

Bwahahaha that's not used. That's new. Talk to us again when you pick up a car with 50 000 on it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Electric cars don't normally need a battery replacement during the car's lifetime. If the battery needs to be replaced, the car has usually already been running longer than most ICE cars ever would. The used market for EVs used to be pretty dire, with little supply and awful pricing. But it's slowly getting better. But of course the fact remains, that there is currently a lot of demand for cheap EVs and little supply. The Chinese are gearing up to eat up that part of the market.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

What?

Show me a battery that goes 200k - 300k.

Just because the average consumer is an idiot and replaces cars long before then doesn't mean the vehicles can't go that far.

Every car my family has owned for the last 30 years has gone at least 200k, some 300k+. My current 2005 vehicle is at 270k, and I expect many more years from it, barring an accident. Our newest vehicle is from 2016, and is approaching 100k. An electric vehicle would be needing a battery soon, while all mine needs is an oil change, and perhaps a timing belt for $50 (to be fair, I'll probably spend $250 and replace the water pump, idlers, and primary belt while I'm there. Last time was 100k miles ago).

[–] as97531@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can keep you updated on my own EV ownership if you'd like. I bought a '22 Chevy Bolt brand new for $27k a hair over 12 months ago and so far it's got 51,000 miles on the odometer and the battery has lost only 10 miles of range compared to the 240 it came with, which is such a small loss it might actually be due to the wind or temps on my test since I do my range tests on the freeway during road trips. Despite driving on average more than 137 miles every single day in this EV during the summer, rain, winter, and multiple snow storms (yay Midwest -_-), the battery seems to be holding up pretty well. My plan is to drive the car for at least 5 years before considering a replacement, at which point I should have between 230-270k on the odometer. The only maintenance items on the car are tires every 50-60k, new coolant in the coolant loops every 150k, brakes every 100k or whenever they wear out (which varies wildly based on how an EV is driven), and wipers + wiper fluid as needed.

My goal here isn't to put you on blast or call you a liar because skepticism is fair. I'm just sharing my own experience so far with a car that runs on EV tech last updated in 2015. I was pretty worried the "abuse" I'd be putting it through with my driving would cause it to have problems or perform worse than it should, but so far it's doing great and the battery isn't any worse for wear than other Bolts who have published their numbers online.

Personally I'm really looking forward to finding out how well the 2022+ Tesla Model 3s do with the new LFP battery because supposedly they'll be a big improvement over the NCM batteries they have been using (which my car also uses) when it comes to longevity and being left alone for really long periods of time (months, years).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

EV batteries are lasting longer than expected.

Also, when accounting for maintenance over, EV's can be cheaper over time even with a battery replacement. They don't need oil, engine coolest, or transmission fluid. There's a whole life support system for ICE cars that EVs just don't have, and what replaces it tends to last indefinitely if there are no manufacturing defects or have an abusive owner. Brake maintenance is also reduced; they need the fluid changed, but regen braking tends to reduce the need to replace pads. Manufactures were already seeing pads and rotors on hybrids last nearly the life of the vehicle.

It all adds up, and while the $10k battery cost years down the line scares people as one big number, it often ends up being less than what you would have spent on maintenance over the same time period.

Finally, the batteries may not be worthless at the end of that time. Putting them in houses for backup power is often still feasible. You're just not getting the same range out of them anymore.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Why does it have to be new? Whats wrong with a nearly new car that is only a couple of years old? Warranty, at least in Europe covers the major components like body shell and battery for 7 to 10 years now.

Part of reducing the impact of cars to the environment is making them last longer and EVs have the opportunity to be fully refurbished at what would have been the end of their normal lifespan to better than new. Replacing the battery pack for a more modern and denser version, replacing the motor for a more efficient and powerful one, even replace the entertainment unit with a more modern one. Sure, this is expensive but you are basically getting a new car for considerably less than a new car.

While I personally think Musk can eat a bag of dicks, the ability to upcycle early Teslas using Tesla parts is very welcome. It needs to be legally mandated that manufacturers have to offer this and end the cycle of scrapping cars.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] franklin@lemmy.world 131 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

As trade with North America and China degraded that was one of the worst casualties.

China has a booming market for small EVs. It is not an understatement to say they are years ahead of us in that regard.

What is it North America? Because you said I'm not allowed to have public transit and now I'm not even allowed to have the type of car I want.

Oh boy do I love freedom.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Oil companies invented a psyop in North America centered around male insecurity with their masculinity. That's why the best selling vehicle in North America is a massive gas guzzling pickup truck that the average person can't come close to affording but drives anyway.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They've also targeted maternal instincts. You can't get a mother to look at a car unless the hood is taller than someone else's child.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SilverFlame@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I like when people drive lifted pickups without a speck of dirt in the bed. I call those vehicles the Pedestrian Killer 9000

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Pavement princess

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ComradeWeebelo@lemm.ee 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't sound like you're from NA, but here in the US we have trucks that are colloquially known as "Child Killers" because when you're driving them, you literally can't see what's in front of you. They are all over the roads, and make for an extremely bad experience for people in smaller vehicles, people on bikes, and pedestrians. Not to mention, they're often driven by people that lean heavily into road rage.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Imho, the problem is that North American roads are not safe for small vehicles. If you're a suburbanite who spends an hour in your car every day on expressways full of trucks and SUVs, you don't generally want to be in a slow, tiny, short, vulnerable vehicle where you're beneath the consideration and sightline and possibly wheels of traffic.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seriously, in Texas even a full size 4-door sedan feels small compared to all he lifted oversized pickups all over.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

While I totally agree with what you are saying, unfortunately, the Chinese EV revolution may be largely a lie. Google fake Chinese ev sales if you are interested.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Crazy to see how far behind Japanese car manufacturers are getting these days. Japan disrupted the auto market and made small, fuel efficient, cars popular. Now Honda and Toyota are starting to feel like 70’s Detroit.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Meanwhile Hyundai and Kia are absolutely smashing it (in Europe and Asia) with their cheap, reliable cars

[–] KpntAutismus@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

can't really agree with the "reliable" part but yea, they are affordable.

[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

2013 Hyundai Elantra here. Despite full synthetic oil changes every 5k miles and new filters every year, my engine has now failed for a second time in 100k miles. The mechanic is telling me it needs a new engine, which is going to basically exceed the value of the car.

But at least it was cheap!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dakku@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Meanwhile Hyundai and Kia are absolutely smashing it (in Europe and Asia) with their cheap, reliable cars

And easy to steal

Edit: Downvote me all you want, I got mine stolen this year in Bulgaria, and if you check the news there's a lot of Tucsons stolen like every week. Along with the recent callback of models that risk getting on fire, Hyundai has a pretty shit reputation lately and I wouldn't buy one again even it was free.

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I thought only the American models were easy to steal because they left out some critical antitheft features on the lowest cost models? Didn't think it impacted other countries.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sndrtj@feddit.nl 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not in Europe. That fiasco only happened in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reversedposterior@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Because the US doesn't make engine immobilisers mandatory like the rest of the world does

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Hyundai knowingly left an easy exploit to hotwire their cars in for several years. The redesigned a few cars to try to rebrand after fixing it, but they cut corners there too, and now they're in the middle of recalling the Tuscan for exploding batteries.

Sorry, Hyundai isn't a role model here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Last I looked into it, Toyota was still supposed to have some of the most efficient combustion engines out there, with something crazy like 40%(?) thermal efficiency.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

As far as I know Mazda are the highest with their gas engines that have diesel compression ratio.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

We did nothing and tried everything!

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So let’s build an unaffordable EV?

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (17 children)

They’re saying they don’t care about the cheaper segments and are just going to sell expensive vehicles. I don’t know what those of us who can’t afford 60k vehicles are expected to do for transit though… I suspect this is a ploy to get the American government to subsidize an affordable car range.

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (8 children)

We can buy Chinese cars. They are starting to kill it on EV’s, with an already expansive supply chain. It is only a matter of time before they start showing up in the US.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they get approved by the DOT, which is unlikely both due to government sentiment towards Chinese businesses and the fact of they probably don’t actually meet our safety guidelines

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Some of BYD's models just got 5 star saftey ratings in the EU.

Those super cheap, tiny, death trap looking cars, are mostly just that, but these newer EV companies are making better vehicles. They'll be in the US soon enough. Safety won't be an issue.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltaylor/2022/10/13/byd-ev-enters-europe-with-a-5-star-euro-ncap-safety-score

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] karpintero@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's a bummer. Was interested to see what a Honda EV with ultium cells would be like. A sub-$30k EV is what a lot of people are looking for, judging from my experience buying a Bolt. Hope they can figure out the unit-economics

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm a little sad about this - the planned Honda looked nice, the range would have been fine for us (we usually take our pickup on longer road trips anyway), and I was hoping to replace our Mazda 3 with one if it drove nicely and all that. I admit that I had some concerns about the GM underpinnings, though - my experience with American brands is rough, and our experience with GM is the roughest.

We plan to hit the auto shows next year to get an idea of what we want to look at more closely.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 16 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


"After studying this for a year, we decided that this would be difficult as a business, so at the moment we are ending development of an affordable EV," said Honda CEO Toshihiro Mibe in an interview with Bloomberg.

In July, GM had to idle BrightDrop's production line in Canada due to a shortage of battery cells, and Kelly Blue Book's sales data for the first three quarters of 2023 show that just 6,920 Ultium-based EVs (which include the Chevrolet Blazer and Silverado EV, as well as the Hummer, Lyriq, and BrightDrop van) were delivered to customers.

GM had said it was ending Bolt production this year at its plant in Orion Township, Michigan, so that it could retool and start building electric trucks beginning in 2024.

The Honda Prologue and Acura ZDX are a pair of electric crossovers that use the same platform as the Cadillac Lyriq and Chevrolet Blazer, and both are still happening.

They'll even feature Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, which GM has controversially chosen to eliminate from its cars from model year 2024 onward.

And Honda even announced another collaboration with GM earlier today—in 2026, it wants to start operating a robotaxi service in Japan using the Cruise Origin, an autonomous electric vehicle developed by the GM-backed AV company.


The original article contains 606 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] woodenskewer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GM has blamed the Ultium bottleneck on an unspecified "automation equipment supplier."

Rockwell Automation has entered the chat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›