this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
119 points (98.4% liked)

science

14350 readers
137 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neptune@dmv.social 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

University of Otago physicists have used a small glass bulb containing an atomic vapor to demonstrate a new form of antenna for radio waves. The bulb was "wired up" with laser beams and could therefore be placed far from any receiver electronics.

Apparently it can cover more frequencies than a typical antenna design. Cool

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

that's great, however

In particular, this happens for RF frequencies that couple the Rydberg level resonantly to other nearby Rydberg levels. For sufficiently large fields, the atoms are receptive to a broad range of RF signals via the AC Stark shift.

meaning there's physical limit on where these bands need to be, outside of these regions it's less sensitive, and it's mostly microwaves anyway (authors tested 16-20GHz)

we are able to make very compact extremely broadband receive (and also transmit) antennas for microwave bands, it's a log spiral antenna backed with cavity. easily can reach to over 40GHz, much simpler, smaller (counting all optics) and probably with much better sensitivity. already used in radar warning receivers, and has nice property that on lower end it's limited by size, but on upper end on precision of the central section - so can be made really wideband

also that's really just a transducer, still needs a box with lasers and some other machinery that allows for demodulating that optical signal. "RF detector that doesn't contain metal" is a weird advantage because there's usually a large amount of metal connections required to actually do something useful with that freshly collected signal

actual article https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article/123/14/144003/2914151/Distant-RF-field-sensing-with-a-passive-Rydberg

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

also that's really just a transducer, still needs a box with lasers and some other machinery that allows for demodulating that optical signal. "RF detector that doesn't contain metal" is a weird advantage because there's usually a large amount of metal connections required to actually do something useful with that freshly collected signal

30m away (that's longer than a basketball court!), though, and probably more because this demo was "no particular effort". I don't know the use case, but I'm guessing it's not a home router.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I would probably argue that it's not so much pointless as it currently has more limited use cases than conventional means. This may or may not change in the future.

[–] 5BC2E7@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

This is the type of content we need more of in lemmy. thank you.

[–] LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

"In October 2018, the United States Army Research Laboratory publicly discussed efforts to develop a super wideband radio receiver using Rydberg atoms. In March 2020, the laboratory announced that its scientists analysed the Rydberg sensor's sensitivity to oscillating electric fields over an enormous range of frequencies—from 0 to 10^12^ Hz (the spectrum to 0.3mm wavelength). The Rydberg sensor can reliably detect signals over the entire spectrum and compare favourably with other established electric field sensor technologies, such as electro-optic crystals and dipole antenna-coupled passive electronics."

Wikipedia, Rydberg atom

It's a neat wiki entry, I recommend it. I hadn't heard of Rydberg atoms before today.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

should be 10^12^ Hz or 1 THz

[–] LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz 1 points 11 months ago

TY! One moment, I just ctrl CV'd and this is what happens.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It sounds like it has no ability to transmit though, right?