Good bid, if Chelsea doesn't give up on their nonsense 80m, then we should just move on. We have enough drama and sagas going on, we don't need more.
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
9 points (90.9% liked)
Red Devils
921 readers
1 users here now
All things Manchester United.
New to the community? Come say hi in the Welcome thread.
Got any suggestions on how we can improve and grow as a community? Let us know!
Basic rules:
- Fuck the Glazers
- Be civil to each other
- No non-Manchester United/football content. Non-United content is allowed if it affects United in some way. Otherwise, use the Daily Discussion Thread
- Fuck the Glazers
- Before posting news, please refer to the Journalist Reliability Guide
- Keep it legal - no streams please :)
- Have fun!
- Fuck the Glazers
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
My only worry is that United’s Art of the Deal takes over and we end up paying even more because we’ve dragged our heels too long. Set a limit and walk away if they refuse.
The fact that they most likely can get 50 should be enough for them as they have so many players they need to sell.
While I’m not personally a fan of Mount, he would give depth which is sorely needed. It’s also nice to see us trying to do business early, just hope we don’t drag it on.
It'd add depth but 50m would make him 1st team and somebody else is going to be the depth option. Would he get in City's team or even Arsenal?
Great to hear, hopefully this deal can be done quickly!
Let's see if we've learnt our transfer lessons this time. Hopefully get this done quickly, and have all business done before preseason.
Hopefully we move on if they reject the next bid and start looking at someone else. I'd love for us to get him but surely there's someone similar out there who who'll be better or won't cost 70/80