this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
52 points (93.3% liked)

Hacker News

2171 readers
50 users here now

A mirror of Hacker News' best submissions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crawley@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Third party will never ever happen with the electoral college. Whichever party forms a third party and said third party will both lose 100% of the time.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

Isn’t it funny that even politics is duopoly in the US?

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

I think Yang had it right by changing the voting system entirely

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The electoral college has less of an impact than fptp voting IMO. Ranked choice or Star voting would actually allow third party candidates to win local elections at least.

[–] Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For a third party system, It’s not about losing it’s about making sure those other guys lose.

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It about making the guys who you hate least lose, ironically. Voting against the other guy is already baked into FPTP, so if you vote for a 3rd party you're voting against both the main parties. Except the party you hate the most would've already gotten your anti-vote anyway, so really you're just adding an anti-vote to the other party, which is adding a handicap to them that wasn't there before.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Proportional representation is the way to go.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, don’t be fooled. Repubes will still line up to vote for the naziest candidate they can find.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

That just means that we need an independent Nazi candidate to pull votes from the GOP, guaranteeing a loss for both.

[–] emc@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Not possible with first past the post. Pointless to even talk about.

[–] workinkindofhard@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

If it didn’t happen in 2016 it isn’t going to happen.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If we appointed the president by number of individual donations Bernie Sanders would have won in 2016 and 2020 by a landslide