this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
5 points (63.2% liked)

UK Politics

3103 readers
335 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn refused to condemn Hamas at a left-wing event held outside the Labour Party conference.

Mr Corbyn said he did not "support any attacks", but in a tetchy exchange with journalists declined to set out his view on Hamas despite being repeatedly asked whether he would condemn the group.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mannycalavera 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's happening over there is an absolute tragedy and just a shit situation all around for everyone but purely in terms of political timing this is a free kick for Labour to show how they've changed since 2015. Lammy's announcement will go some way to win back support that Labour lost during those years. No doubt it will also anger many on the fringe of the party .

[–] buzziebee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Can you imagine where we'd be if those fringe elements had managed to keep Corbyn in charge like they wanted? He'd be doing exactly what he's been doing today (refusing to criticise Hamas for raping and murdering civilians) and we'd be facing another 5 years of Tory destruction.

Sure I'd like Kier to be more outspoken and advertise more specific progressive policies, but he's playing to win. He's refusing to give the Tory press ammunition and it's working. Once they are in they can actually do stuff to help the British people.

I think we'll be pleasantly surprised about the scope of the agenda once we're closer to the election and there's less time for the right wing media to try and brainwash people against the manifesto.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Those on the fringes don't matter, because they're not the ones who will win Labour an election.

[–] DoneItDuncan -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nothing someone says before the word "but" really counts. I'm glad this tragedy is doing wonders for your political faction.

[–] mannycalavera 5 points 1 year ago

Give it a rest mate.

[–] galmuth 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Vintage Corbyn - Can't bring himself to condemn an actual terrorist attack against Israelis.

It's so easy to directly and clearly condemn Hamas, whilst also supporting innocent Palestinians and Israelis, yet he simply cannot do it. 🤔

[–] blackn1ght 4 points 1 year ago

It was the same when Russia invaded Ukraine too, he couldn't bring himself to condemn Russia for the invasion, but instead just blamed NATO.

Corbyn seems like he'd be right at home on Lemmygrad.

[–] alwaysbeclosing@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

@galmuth @mannycalavera why are you still obsessed with him? He's not a Labour MP. He said he does not support any attacks.

[–] mannycalavera 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why are you still obsessed with him? He's not a Labour MP.

He's a prominent ex Labour leader that fought two general elections for the party and has (had) a massive influence on left leaning politics in the UK. He's hardly unworthy of comment. If he were totally irrelevant he wouldn't be attending a fringe meeting at Labour party conference. In short, he's still newsworthy.

He said he does not support any attacks.

As others have said this is obfuscation is what people don't like about him. It was the same when he was leader and the same stance he took with Brexit that lost him all those votes in the North. He doesn't support attacks, excellent. So that means he doesn't support a proscribed terrorist group.... errr look away everyone nothing to see here.

We get that he's pro peace but why he simply doesn't say "I condemn Hamas terror attacks and I condemn Israel over retaliation" is completely beyond most people.

[–] alwaysbeclosing@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@mannycalavera You understand he's "pro peace" but because he hasn't said it in the very specific way you want means you have to bring him up in the way you did? He said "any attacks", get over it.

[–] mannycalavera 1 points 1 year ago

I am pro peace and thoroughly condem brutal attacks by Hamas.

Why is this so hard for him to say?

By not saying it like this he's inviting criticism upon himself. By sitting on the fence it suggests he's comfortable with what they've done. He's supposed to be a politician.

I'm glad Labour is now distancing themselves from him because it invites criticism to whatever party he's aligned with too.

[–] galmuth 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not obsessed with him, it's in the news and I'm commenting on it.

You're right, the guy is now irrelevant but I find it funny that even after being repeatedly savaged in the media for cosying up to and refusing to condemn Hamas, he hasn't learned a thing and he still can't do it.

[–] alwaysbeclosing@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@galmuth he said "any attacks". Get over it. Accusing him of "cosying up" when trying to initiate dialogue is petty.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Speaking to a fringe event at the Labour conference, Mr Lammy said "Israel has a right to self-defence against terrorism".

Mr Corbyn said he did not "support any attacks", but in a tetchy exchange with journalists declined to set out his view on Hamas despite being repeatedly asked whether he would condemn the group.

The former leader is sitting as an independent MP after being removed from Labour's parliamentary party over his response to a report on antisemitism under his leadership.

Speaking at the Labour conference Mr Lammy reminded members that "Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organisation" in the UK.

Labour's official position is to support a two-state solution respecting "sovereignty of Israel and the dignity and human rights of Palestinians," Mr Lammy said.

Sir Keir described the rocket fire and incursions from Gaza as an "appalling terrorist attack", saying Israel has "every right to defend herself".


The original article contains 488 words, the summary contains 147 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Convicted antisemite refuses to condemn Hamas: film at 11

[–] Sooperstition@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Extra, extra! Read all about it! Spineless liberals cozy up to apartheid state!

[–] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Corbyn is the best. Labour cowards