this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
-6 points (35.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4108 readers
198 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link for us cheapskates:

https://archive.ph/zVt1R

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Sounds like CEOs slave driving again.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Krystal ended the experiment prematurely after finding response times suffered. On Monday, its busiest day, the team was only 50 per cent staffed

Whose stupid idea was it to make Monday's one of the days off then? Sounds more like bad management

[–] GreatAlbatross 6 points 1 year ago

Wednesday is best, imho.

Anything that happens on weds, you've got time to catch it on Thurs/Fri. And you've only got to deal with two work days at a time.

[–] guriinii@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It is also likely that companies would need to employ more staff to cover the reduced hours. That would cut into those precious profits though.

[–] JoBo 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This aspect of the four day week idea has been missing from the discourse. For the avoidance of doubt, I absolutely support it. But the proposal must explicitly include hourly paid workers (for whom it means a 25% increase in hourly pay) and it must explicitly include workers whose productivity cannot possibly increase by 25% to make up for the missing hours because of the nature of the work (whether it's answering phones or assembling widgets).

In this real world that we live in, where employers are free to pick and choose which employees it applies to, it's very hard to see it leading to equitable outcomes.

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk -3 points 1 year ago

We got offered 4 day weeks.. most people didn't take it although I note a couple did as they're not around on Fridays any more.

I have enough work to do without compressing it into less time..