44
I appreciate the Twitter screenshot so I don't have to see that abysmal X logo loading.
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
44 points (95.8% liked)
Formula 1
8990 readers
308 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| πΈπ¬ Singapore | 20-22 Sep |
| πΊπΈ United States | 18-20 Oct |
| π²π½ Mexico | 25-27 Oct |
| π§π· Brazil | 01-03 Nov |
| πΊπΈ United States | 21-23 Nov |
| πΆπ¦ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Wait. So we can reconfigure the track, without it needing to be re-graded?
Bringing the outside edge closer a few cm in one small section of the track isn't really a big reconfiguration imho
It's a change in track configuration. Don't know how the FIA can claim it's a safe track now.
Am I right in thinking that modifying a circuit by moving the white line is unprecedented? In Indy 2005 they refused to make changes to the track (not that I can think of any that would have worked in that situation).
It seems like a safe solution to a situation that shouldnβt have arisen, though.
In Indy 2005 they refused to make changes to the track
That was because of the politics between Michelin and Bridgestone. All teams had to agree to track changes like that back then and the Bridgestone shod teams refused to allow the change