this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
224 points (100.0% liked)

News

49 readers
2 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

The chief justice doesn’t like his conservative Supreme Court colleagues getting called out for judicial overreach.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Seasoned_Greetings@kbin.social 115 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if the court didn't engage in clearly partisan politics, maybe the liberal justices wouldn't have anything to criticize.

Does he realize how bad it looks when he voices that his problem is criticism and not like, I don't know, taking money from political interests? Or refusing to recuse in cases where there's a relative directly involved?

[–] sab@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is really incredible how far down the drain the SCOTUS has gone in such a short period of time. Not saying it was great before Justice Kennedy retired either, but at least back then it was generally respected.

[–] kmkz_ninja@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hope RoyGBiv is rolling in her grave at refusing to step down and let Obama select a replacement when she knew the power of her position.

[–] nameless_prole@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, she's dead which means she will never even have the capacity to understand what her decision meant.

[–] sethadam1@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think they would've filled her spot when they didn't fill the other one with Merrick Garland? She protected her spot or they would've held it up until Trump.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She could have retired at any time, including right after Obama was elected. The Republicans couldn't have held the spot open for years. It would have become a major election issue.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Why won't they just let us make wildly unpopular decisions that jeopardize the livelihoods of Americans without having to make us feel bad about it?!"

-Roberts, 2023

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Why can't we be blatantly corrupt without getting called on it? "

[–] swope@kbin.social 70 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let me know when Roberts begs the others to stop taking massive gifts that look like bribes.

[–] sab@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tsk, they only look like bribes if you're looking. You should stop doing that as well.

[–] Niello@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None of these people deserve their positions.

[–] nameless_prole@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't know, I like Sotomayor. And Brown-Jackson seems alright. And I really don't have much opinion on Kagan aside from the fact that I usually agree with her rulings. As for Conservatives, I disagree with all of them almost always, but Gorsuch at least seems to care about consistency, and I think his views on Native affairs is admirable.

[–] Niello@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it's not clear, I mean all the conservatives that clearly were put there for nefarious reasons. And none of them deserves a life time position on the supreme court regardless, and by them here I mean everyone, not just conservatives.

[–] NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

Snowflake behavior

[–] dosidosankofa@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Holy crap this is endgame. The head of the judicial body is too concerned about the feelings of the body?

So, just logically. I have a personal commitment and value to something. And somebody gets mad at me about it. My values and commitment should be able to withstand that? Yes? As soon as someone has a different opinion it's like "I can't bear to hear a different opinion (clutches pearls) and I can't stand to have my opinion critiqued"

For you and me and the lady in the checkout line (and I say that as a lady who is often in checkout lines), that's great. But this is the head of the judicial body of one of the most powerful nations - most powerful democracies - on earth. These are opinions that shape the lives of 300 million people at least. And he's gonna be there for another quarter of a century.

Like how many steps is Roberts from a kind of de facto chilling effect, and I'm not trying to be funny

Thank God for the generations who hear a public figure try to corral or control a situation and then begin to act in doing the exact opposite. Definitely need to remind the conservative justices that there are people out here

End rant (for now)

[–] RestrictedAccount@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I don’t think he is anywhere near a chilling effect on the liberal justices.

They main problem we have with SCOTUS is that they don’t have to GAF what anybody says.

That is good if the person has principles, but has problems if they are grifting trash.

The thing he should be complaining about is the bribes - I’m sorry, speech - that the justices are taking. But since he gets 8 figures of speech by consulting gigs for his wife, there is no chance the Chief Grifter will tackle the real problem.

[–] xuxebiko@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

People should be silent while we destroy their future - Roberts, 2023

[–] lunar_parking@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The supreme court even as a concept is one of the most asinine yet accepted institutions in the world. On par with the Catholic church, but so much worse because it actually has enormous and direct power over 330+ million people. I am dreaming and pining for the day that someone in power, most likely a president, just legitimately tells them to fuck off. They have no enforcement power and they fucking know it. I'm yearning for someone to have the courage, but it's as clear as it possibly can be that it certainly won't be a Democrat.

[–] zalack@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The thing is that the court only has so much power right now because Congress is so fucking broken. If Congress where in working order it could just legislate all the shit that the court is blocking the executive on.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DpwnShift@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Undoing decades of precedent to make political agenda-based rulings that will drastically change the lives of people in this country forever... That's fine, just don't criticize the court, or expect them to adhere to any ethical guidelines...

[–] Nicenightforawalk@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

The fact that these republicans took nearly a million dollars in loan forgiveness for covid themselves then complain about helping kids out is hypocrisy of the highest order.

Roberts complains about his extreme right wing judges being singled out then takes away rights for LGBTQ people on a hypothetical not actual laws. The person never existed and was all thought up by the extreme right billionaire friends to put in front of the court.
Absolutely disgusting. So John roberts deserves all the criticism coming at him.

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Just accept your lot peasants and obey

load more comments
view more: next ›