I suspect that in a subsistence level culture, everyone who can, will take part in any methods to get more food!
Science
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.
Except me... I'm really, really lazy
Yes, when I think about it that way it makes the whole "men hunted, women gathered" concept seem really silly.
I bet subsistence leads to a level of pragmatism we haven't seen on a societal level since. It takes a certain level of your needs being met to start making up rules.
If the best hunter in the tribe is a woman... Get to it, we all want to eat right?
That's revolutionary!
This is why everything you hear from pop-evolution theories in sociology is likely bs.
“Women like shopping because they used to be gatherers” or other such garbage.
It’s all trying to simplify human behaviour based on half-baked knowledge of the past, and to pass it off as scientific insight. It’s not much different than the pseudoscience used to fuel racism 100 years ago.
Human behaviour is complex. And even though our societies are more complex now than 10000 years ago, it doesn’t mean people back then were simple.