this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Gunners

1511 readers
22 users here now

Victoria Concordia Crescit

We are a community for supporters of the North London-based football club Arsenal F.C.

Sister Community: https://lemmy.world/c/arsenalwfc

Join our FPL with League Code: tt2t8e

If old posts remain pinned on other instances, comment on the Daily Discussion with a screenshot!

Transfer Reliability Guide

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Matt_Sams_314@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is an absolutely ridiculous fee (not that I think anyone would pay it)

[–] ChrV@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Chelsea would pay such a fee but they're the one selling, unfortunately for them.

[–] ChrV@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Highly doubt we'll bid that much. Even if we're interested in him we'll bid as much as we evaluate him and move to alternative options. There's always plan b, c, etc.

[–] SemioticStandard@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

If Havertz was worth 70m, then Chelsea wouldn't be selling him.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't Chelsea need to sell by the end of the month for FFP purposes? The price of the brick will come down, surely.

[–] WillfulBedder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess they're hoping a club would be stupid/desperate enough to try to get him now rather than wait until later in the window. Either that or they really don't want to lose him, and hope that they can shift other players far lower in the pecking order to satisfy the FFP requirements.

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure you're right, but they can get fucked, apparently no one wants their overpriced albatrosses.

[–] WillfulBedder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Haha. Yeah I guess the Boehly masterclass didn't work. Can't amortize Albatrosses.

[–] darkufo@fosstodon.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@I_am_the_grass

LOL We'll not be paying anywhere near that if we do get him.

[–] I_am_the_grass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Don't shoot the messenger lol. Just posting the article. Not my opinion.

[–] lemon_meringue_tie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We'll probably leave this until late in the window. We'd be foolish to spend that much on a player before our priority signings are finished.

[–] z2k_@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

No one buying from Chelsea also delays them competing with us on signing players

[–] rjb@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Halve it I reckon, Chelsea are in dreamland... Would definitely take him though!

[–] iuselect@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

70m is a tough sell. On the upside, he is young and fits the age profile. I think there could be better ways of spending that kind of money.

[–] Skyraptor7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I honestly think Chelsea are taking the piss with these prices. 80 for mount and 70 for havertz is insane

[–] ironeaglebird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Chelsea screwing the market with their purchasing and then they want the same inflated prices for their dead weight players.

load more comments
view more: next ›