Trying to erroneously remove someone’s ability to vote needs to be a crime. This is denying citizens their sovereign rights, and people need to be held accountable when this is done fraudulently.
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
285 points (98.0% liked)
politics
19089 readers
3970 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Oh it’s absolutely a crime already. But only if the left were to attempt it.
The Republican war on free and fair elections will never end.
Those 6 should have their voter registration reviewed. Any bets on how many would be rejected?
They don't care. They've already influenced politics far more than they even could by voting.
Maybe all 6 are just the same person anyway
100,000 challenges and not one single prosecution.
Just for the record. Dems can do this too. Guarantee some of these trumpets have a lake home and a real home and it would be pretty easy to challenge residency.
Assuming that their challenge law is simple, which if someone challenged 100,000 voters it kinda seems to be.
Fyi. Someone tried this in Montana in the 2000s and was chided out of court.
If there's no penalty for false challenges, Democrats should challenge every Republican registration.
Fuck that. Let’s run a script to programmatically file challenges for all Republican voter registrations. If they really want to play this game, I am down to clown, motherfuckers.
Republican majority board, if they could guess who's who from where the challenges come from they might just game it anyway
Having to register to be able to vote is so silly to begin with.
In light of the fact that the US has no national ID, and the Constitutional ban on poll taxes, combined with the requirement individual states run their own elections, registration is the best option there is.
We need a way to ensure people are eligible to vote, and a way to ensure people only vote once. A big list of "people who can vote" is the answer.
That said: getting on the list should be easy. Removing someone from the list should be hard.
I feel like this is under-thinking it a bit, but bear with me:
Birth certificate: Added to the list.
Death certificate: Removed from the list
Then it's just a matter of checking age and voting in the correct precinct.
Except people move states. Or voting districts within a state. So you have to be on the right list after you move.
Birth certifications and death certifications aren't universal. There's plenty of cases where someone doesn't have a birth certificate, or a death certificate is issued in error, while the individual is still eligible to vote.
And, as a general thought experiment: How many people live in the same state, much less voting precinct, when they turn 18 that they did when they were born? How do you track that?
Oh yeah the same state with the illegitimate republican governor that oversaw his own election.
Theyre all about the sanctity of elections
Usually isn't any penalty.
I also did a quick Google search and it looks easy AF.
Just need money to buy the datasets and rudimentary SQL knowledge to run a query.
I wonder who opened that loophole?
Edit- /s