this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
3 points (71.4% liked)

Coffee

8283 readers
146 users here now

☕ - The hot beverage that powers the world!

Coffee gadgets - It's always great to learn about new gadgets. Please share your favorite hardware or full setups. It might inspire newcomers to experiment!

Local businesses - Please promote your local businesses. If you are not the owner of the business you are promoting, kindly ask the owner if it's okay. It would be great if the business has a physical store to include an exterior or interior shot.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreezerBurn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I’m pretty sure that the extra stuff people add to it are most likely worse than the coffee is.

[–] goldenjoe6@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

James Hoffmann recently released an interesting video over this. https://youtu.be/rABfboy0h6o

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t think its bad for you, in moderation. And depends how you take coffee. Black vs milk and sugar etc

[–] runawaycorvid@rammy.site 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Short version: yes. As long as sugar and other junk isn’t added. Generally any intake of coffee has benefits over none; and 3-4 cups a day of coffee seemingly the sweet spot. Coffee intake should be minimal/none if pregnant. More studies are still needed on the topic.

Here’s a meta analysis (review of many studies) from the British Medical Association. I removed some wording to shorten their conclusion. https://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5024

Coffee consumption was more often associated with benefit than harm for a range of health outcomes […] with summary estimates indicating largest relative risk reduction at intakes of three to four cups a day versus none, including all cause mortality (relative risk 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.88), cardiovascular mortality (0.81, 0.72 to 0.90), and cardiovascular disease (0.85, 0.80 to 0.90). High versus low consumption was associated with an 18% lower risk of incident cancer (0.82, 0.74 to 0.89). Consumption was also associated with a lower risk of several specific cancers and neurological, metabolic, and liver conditions. Harmful associations were largely nullified by adequate adjustment for smoking, except in pregnancy […] There was also an association between coffee drinking and risk of fracture in women but not in men.

[–] cuchilloc@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

Alle Dinge sind Gift, und nichts ist ohne Gift; allein die Dosis macht, dass ein Ding kein Gift ist.” All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; the dosage alone makes it so a thing is not a poison. —Paracelsus, 1538. wiki

[–] Dravin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My understanding (mirrored by this article) is that the primary concern is the additives such as sugar and cream and caffeine. So if you drink it black and don't go overboard with the amount it looks neutral to slightly positive. The comment about using a paper filter is new to me and slightly unwelcome news as a French press user though. Though a quick peek elsewhere (here) suggests that as long as you have healthy cholesterol levels to not be *too *worried about it.

[–] ColoradoBoy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Parkinson’s runs in my family so I actually try to drink at least 3-4 servings a day. Totally black and at least two are espresso pulls so the caffeine per serving is less. It seems like every other week there are conflicting studies. This week, coffee is good. 😀 And not to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but I tend to be a little bit skeptical about how most of the studies regarding dietary cholesterol are designed anyway. It is famously difficult to accurately track and control nutritional studies. I’m fortunate to have low cholesterol anyway, but if it’s a concern, the compounds thought to raise cholesterol are in the extracted oils so a paper filter takes most of them out. Only about 10% of my coffee is paper filtered, so if I stop posting here, you know what happened…

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anecdotal, but I've heard that coffee drinkers are more resistant to radiation poisoning than non-drinkers.

Please don't take me at my word and handle spent reactor rods after chugging an espresso.

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

brb chugging a nice cup of expresso and then eating a radiated taco

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I specifically said... never mind. Bon appetit.

load more comments
view more: next ›