this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
30 points (89.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12250 readers
1006 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.

Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who's charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.

The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.

Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook's associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie's face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.

On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn't seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.

Asked why he didn't stop the prank despite Colie's repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn't exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

“There was no reaction,” Cook said.

In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook's pranks.

“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that's all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”

Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn't have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook's confusing behavior.

She said the prosecution's account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”

In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”

Cook's “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff's deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.

Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook's videos.

Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hey guys, can we quit with the calls for the deaths of assholes? Lemmy.world's server rules include this:

  1. No links to content supporting, featuring, or promoting hate movements, terrorism, mass violence, or calls to violence.

I've seen that interpreted as including comments that call for someone's death, and I don't want to see this shit get out of hand and draw admin attention.

This particular piece of shit, Tanner Cook, deserves to have his channels shut down, deserves some prison time, and deserves some kind of court order preventing him from pulling stupid "pranks" on anyone ever again. Maybe then he can do something productive with his life, instead of... whatever the fuck it is he's doing right now.

But he can't do that if he's dead.

Being an asshole isn't a capital offense, worthy of summary execution. And the judge in this case apparently agrees.

So just tone it down a little, OK?

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People only see this with the context that this is a youtuber doing a prank.

This man is 6 fucking 5. Imagine a random giant gets in your face, you think you're about to be robbed or beaten. He advances. You retreat. He advances. You retreat, he advanced. Again, you retreat, he advances, all the while shoving something in your face. How many times do you need to tell someone to disengage and retreat before its okay to consider it a threat?

Just because this guy happened to be a youtuber doing a prank is irrelevant, imo.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tbf imo while I carry a gun, I also carry mace for shit like this. From the above description it seems normal force was certainly justified but deadly force is questionable, however I withhold personal judgement as I'm not following the case and the details reported could be (often are) wildly innacurate from the facts.

[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This assumes a level of focus, presence of mind, and training to reliably discriminate between injurious and non-injurious active threats and measure your response with non-lethal force on a gamble that your attacker is non going to be physically violent towards you.

Cops fail at this all the time, it's not reasonable to treat non-injurious threats as acceptable behavior and demand non-police with zero legal protections handle it better.

If you're going to walk up to a stranger in the street and threaten them, then proceed to advance when they respond with "please stop! Get away from me!", you have forfeited any right to benefit of the doubt on their part.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Take away the gun for a minute. Would this guy be on trial if he instead hit him in the head with a blunt object? I’m not a fan of guns, not approving of firing them in public, so on and so forth, but I think this person may have been justified in defending themselves.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A doordash driver gets cornered by a large 6 foot 5 man who aggressively shoves a phone in his ear repeatedly calling them a dipshit who thinks about their "twinkle", tries to get away but is followed, explicitly asks the man to leave him alone 3 times but is ignored, and tries to brush the phone away? Yeah that sounds like a situation a reasonable person might fear for their life in, and before anyone goes "well why didn't they use a less lethal self defense method?", the prankster is 6 foot 5 and the victim likely only had his fists or his gun for self defense, one of those two is going to get you out of that situation alive

[–] wulrus@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Just based on the facts from what information we have, I fully agree. The story would have to change significantly in order to show anything other than exemplary display of good self-defence principles:

  • avoid being in a shady location - check
  • when getting in a sticky situation anyway, attempt to flee / defuse (good judgement on what to try first) - check
  • if still in the threats phase: back off a bit to clearly demonstrate that you are not the aggressor, support that verbally - check
  • If it is clear that the attacker ignores your pleas, do the minimum damage to STOP the attack safely. Based on that principle, he could have pulled & shot a lot sooner, but apparently wanted to be more defensive & nice than most would have been - check

You should not allow a verbally aggressive person to stay at a distance where they could land a punch or use a concealed knife at any time, especially after you backed off already. Try articulating near a cop's face and see what (rightfully) happens.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Go to his channel and report his prank videos

Click on the gear icon > report > harmful or dangerous act

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is so American even the bullet was wearing a star spangled bandana and riding an eagle 🦅

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Our freedumbs.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 4 points 1 year ago

I'm sure we can trust what this young man says... :P

[–] Riyria@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I keep seeing YouTube shorts of dudes like this doing not just stupid shit, but DANGEROUS shit. I saw this one of this dude flashing gang signs in gang territory in LA. You DO NOT do that shit. Any time someone would get aggressive with him he’s go “it’s a prank there’s a camera!” One of these days he’s going to say that and it’s going to piss the dude he flashed signs at off even more and he is going to get shot.

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

According to Darwin, this is evolution - and not everyone makes it.

[–] Luke_Fartnocker@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not a proponent of violence, but I think these dipshits need to get their asses beaten every time they do that shit. Maybe, if more of them got beaten or shot, then they would stop being ass fucks.

I shouldn't have to be forced to figure out whether someone is a crazy, drug induced murderer, or just some stupid "prankster" every time I go out in public. Rule number 1 in a society is "don't fuck with strangers".

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

"It's just a prank" needs to end.

[–] Rawdogg@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was completely inevitable, I've seen one or two videos of 'pranks' and felt its only a matter of time before someone gets assaulted or shot, now the little shit has more viewers

[–] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, people are legit insane these days, and basically everyone has a gun. Like, forget pranks for a sec, I was telling my wife that the cart narc guy is probably lucky to be alive and he's playing Russian roulette and loading another every time...

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude deserved to be punched in the face, not shot. I hate people who do stuff like this and wish they'd stop getting attention. But I can't imagine how you could justify shooting someone over it.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. It's complex.

It's more or less assault by Cook. I mean ok in hindsight there wasn't that much of a threat to Colie, but if I were queueing somewhere minding my own business and out of nowhere this big guy was getting in my face about his twinkie it would be... "very intense".

By Cook's own admission he was trying to illicit confusion. IDK if that's really an emotion in and of itself, rather a conflict between multiple emotions. In this case those emotions would be fear, anger, embarrassment, whatever.

If Cook were to say "I was behaving in an intimidating way in order to illicit fear, anger, embarrassment, and a conflict between all of those emotions on the part of Colie" it sounds much more like assault.

Yet the fact remains that Colie's reaction of shooting the guy isn't really proportionate to the threat. Certainly in most places which are not America Colie has broken the law and Cook has not... despite that feeling somewhat unjust.

Rather than changing the law to allow people to shoot youtubers on sight (as appealing as that sounds) - I think it might be better for force platforms like youtube et al to have some social responsibility and at least exclude this type of content at least at a policy level.

I know my views on this are probably abnormal in some way but it just seems way inappropriate to me to use the public even as extras in your social media content. Like if I'm at a cafe or something and someone starts making a video even if I'm merely providing some infinitessimal portion of ambiance I just find that grossly inappropriate. I guess I just have to suck it up as part of being "in public" in 2023.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

I think it might be better for force platforms like youtube et al to have some social responsibility and at least exclude this type of content at least at a policy level.

I don't know why this hasn't occurred to me and why I haven't seen anyone suggest it before now. This sounds like a great solution to the problem.

[–] corm@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Hard disagree, he deserved worse. If you assault someone then expect to find out.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Assume that if you threaten someone, they will in turn assume you are a threat.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

What you gonna do? Shoot me?

Wait, has it been illegal to shoot YouTubers this entire time?

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

DoorDash driver 🥲

How much do you think the poor guy makes? And now he has to pay for a lawyer, lose the job, and probably go to jail. Only so this dipshit can get the right "reaction".

And the shooting would've been completely justified for a cop.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Anyone who wasn't 6'5 would have gotten their asses beat the first or second time they pulled this shit.

[–] tilgare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

"The poor guy" pulled out a gun and shot a stranger on the street. Why is everybody defending him? Do people so vehemently hate prank YouTubers that they would rather just see them executed at this point? This thread is wild.

[–] stefenauris@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He only has 55K subs? He's not even good at being a YouTuber lol

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

55k subs is no small feat.

load more comments
view more: next ›