this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
450 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

6242 readers
3282 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Big hill to climb after giving them a military and government, but agreed.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Myanmar's military regime had the best grip possible on the armed forces by basically making a separate caste to avoid having the soldiers having second thoughts about shooting at their own families.

It's not going great for them.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

People tend to ignore that civil war, but it's going to be studied for centuries because of all the unique tactics that have been deployed by all sides.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Tbh there's far more happening there than I actually understand, but I know that military advisors around the world are already studying and watching the war. Here's a pretty decent article on it

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Power is where people believe it is.

No one really "controls" a military or government, at every step of the chain people can disagree. And when they do, it doesn't always shake out the way people expect.

I was threatened with a mutinity charge in the Navy, but I stood by my position and like five people didn't get demoted over some bullshit that wasn't their fault.

If I'd have backed down, they'd have been fucked because they were the fall guys.

If trump tries to sic the US government on citizens or blue states, don't expect everyone to just follow orders, even if the people at the very top do. They're still the ones sitting at desks.

Look at South Korea, president tried to pull a coup and basically everyone told him to fuck off. Didn't matter that he was in charge of the military and government

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

This is exactly right. You say no.

Or you say yes, and take your time, fuck it up, do it wrong, report that you succeeded when you did nothing, etc. Wrench in the gears.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

It ain't just that, it's making them have the fight.

Not sure how many people remember Project Pat, but:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLbYMfbBB1w

We used to sing it except "ain't going back to mast" because Captain's Mast was the less formal version of Court Martial. At a mast, the Captain could do whatever they wanted and no one higher up even heard about it.

You had to agree to Mast, if you didn't they'd have to take you to court martial where people outside the chain of command got to hear what's going on. The downside is punishment could be much worse.

Some of my guys were getting fucked, so I told everyone to refuse Captain's Mast, and the command backed down because it was obvious they weren't the problem. But our chain of command showed they didn't give a fuck.

Word spread that a 1/3 of my division got out of demotions, and it was all anyone would talk about.

It's why I don't take the idea of the American military being used against Americans very seriously. The vast majority are just there because they have no other options. They hate the military more than most pascifists do. So it doesn't take much for shit to break down.

That's not even getting into how much of the military are minorities, immigrants, or even non-citizens. They're not gonna do what trump wants them to.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Look at South Korea, president tried to pull a coup and basically everyone told him to fuck off. Didn’t matter that he was in charge of the military and government

So there is a chance!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

There's always a chance...

Up to the point of Terminator robot soldiers, then we're fucked.

By the time we get those, we need to have our shit sorted out.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Military gets overhyped. The U.S. Armed Forces have not successfully managed to root out a guerilla force ever. It's why they lost in Vietnam and why they keep losing in the Middle East. To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure if any modern military is actually equipped to handle a mobilized, armed revolution from their own civilians.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

War overseas isn't same as insurgency at home.

Also, Americans have been living pretty comfortable lives compared to tough mofos in Vietnam and Afghanistan where poverty and instability is/was the norm. Few weeks of hardships and the insurgency in US will die out.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It’s why they lost in Vietnam

I think the main reason is that the war lost popular support back home.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'd argue that if the Army was more effective at fighting againt guerillas, they'd have achieved victory before popular support waned.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. what was that war about again? Preventing communism?

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Maintaining French colonial holdings.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Was it? Man, their marketing sucked.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Hardest pill to swallow: that includes "lesser of two evils".

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Big problem is, if you just wait for them to be toppled, you'll just be subjugated by the one doing the toppling.

You won't solve the overall problems with big violent revolutions, you get it by making the oligarchs irrelevant.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Same principle as fediverse. Decentralized society of active participants, not consumers. Everyone's the master, or some are masters and many are slaves.

[–] Free_Opinions 1 points 16 hours ago