this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
193 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5528 readers
1063 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived copies of the article:

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Au contraire, the oil lobby very much wants this.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 5 hours ago

an energy emergency that for some reason can't use renewable energy.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 3 points 8 hours ago

Drill baby's future, drill!

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

“ThErEs an EnRGy EmergEnCy!

Also, no more wind power please.”

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

At the end of 2024, a Silicon Valley team that included researchers from Stripe, Anthropic, Tesla, and elsewhere produced a report showing that solar microgrids are by far the fastest way to build the power that data centers need. “Estimated time to operation for a large off-grid solar microgrid could be around 2 years (1-2 years for site acquisition and permitting plus 1-2 years for site buildout), though there’s no obvious reason why this couldn’t be done faster by very motivated and competent builders,” the report states. That’s because essentially all you have to do is put up a bunch of solar panels and some batteries and run a wire to your data center—not build a huge centralized power plant and connect it to the grid. The report continues, “Off-grid solar microgrids offer a fast path to power AI datacenters at enormous scale. The tech is mature, the suitable parcels of land in the US Southwest are known, and this solution is likely faster than most, if not all, alternatives.”

I like this.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Why off-grid tho? We should build decentralized grid-tied solar. Every house covers their roofs with free panels

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I want solar but I don't want it on my newish roof with a 50 year waranty. I get why roof installs are popular but why does it seem to be the only solution for consumers that is offered. They can look at my house from maps and see of got a sizable empty plot of land next to my house that could also be used.

[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

And not to mention how expensive it is to get a new roof installed with solar panels on it. They charge a lot of money to remove and put back the panels.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It should be illegal to have a roof without solar.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

It should be illegal to not architect a home to maximize solar.

California has a terrible law that promotes "builder grade" solar of the minimum regulatory size, and then makes adding proper solar more expensive than if they didn't fuck up the house intentionally.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Eh I got the land for it why couldn't I use it? Solar on the roof means you have to go on the roof to fix or troubleshoot. You are adding holes to your roof, unless if you get the tesla solar roof in the first place which you can't trust anything made by them so you are better off keeping them separate.

The only pro I have seen with it being on the roof, which is probably a good one if true, since it is attached to your house, your home insurance would have to cover damages from bad storms / freaks of nature.

Edit: Also beyond the obvious not needing additional land for it.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Because you should be planting trees on that land.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

one solar panel removes more Co2 than 10 trees. (by displacing FF energy)

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 3 hours ago

We need both

[–] chuymatt@startrek.website 1 points 6 hours ago

Depending on the location, no, not really.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, though in practice overall system cost and reliability can be improved by adding wind to the mix.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 12 hours ago

And hydro (to run only at night when the sun and wind isn't producing. For 100% renewable)

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Siting them close to data centers, and connecting them to grid is easy because the utility controlled grid wants the datacenter customer. Utilities are slow to connect solar because they either own or can be bribed by existing FF plants.

A grid connection allows oversizing the solar production, and exporting. But where massive datacenter expansion strains the grid is during daytime peaks. Solar and batteries locally avoids that congestion, and then grid can provide energy and better utilize grid at night.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He doesn't give a shit. He's going to be dead within a decade.

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Fingers crossed it's the earlier part of that decade.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 12 hours ago

Thoughts and prayers

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 10 points 20 hours ago

So say we all.