this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
417 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19346 readers
1679 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (6 children)

If we keep acting like anyone with a D by their name is perfect we'll never fix shit.

The hard truth is the party needs to clean house because when shit like this happens "both sides" is hard to deny

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Third party corruption investigations and prosecutions are needed on every branch of high level government.

The tone is set from the top. Hold the top accountable and the rats will cease to try and climb.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's easy to say but the solution takes a lot more critical thinking for people to vote ethically or even just in their own interests rather than for the team they've been trained to vote for.

Most people either don't have the available time to research, the interest to put the effort in or the capacity to understand the consequences of their choice.

Simplification to "trusted source K recommended by trusted source L says I should vote for team B" is the default solution. "Surely everyone in recommended team B is a fine upstanding person who will fight tooth and nail for my best interests?"

Most people need to be engaged and critical or the system defaults to whoever controls the trusted sources.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

This is what Democrats call bipartisanship.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

the most furious debate of all time will be whether the United States is owned by the AIPAC, or the Russian Mafia.

if they aren't in one pocket, its the other

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

AIPAC has every politician kissing the ring at their conference. It is not even a contest.

If Russia had the same level of influence as Israel, America would be invading Ukraine with Putin.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (7 children)

You see that every single GOP votes with isreal 100% of the time, tho, so vote dem if theres no viable 3rd party in your district.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Here's an idea. We all just stop. And loudly let them know they fucked up. Because rewarding them for this behavior is just going to get more of it.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only 30% of eligible voters vote. If even fewer vote it's even easier for elections to be manipulated

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Scratch a Blue Dog Democrat...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›