this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
580 points (92.9% liked)

196

16801 readers
2455 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 53 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Then technically these should be renamed to "Genital Reveal Parties" but that would imply a different type of party...

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

"Child genital information session."

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 40 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

"Sex reveal party". No, that sounds bad, too. "Assigned sex at birth reveal party". You know what? Maybe we shouldn't make such a big deal about what sex someone is born as and let them tell us who they are as they figure it out.

We should just have a 2nd trimester party or something so the parents get to celebrate at around the same time

[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 17 hours ago
[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Do people feel like you can't say if it's a girl or a boy before they're old enough to express some preference? That seems to be the thing people pick on with gender reveal parties but that doesn't really make sense to me if you're cool with "It's a girl. We're going to name her Alice." without the party. It's not like the party is usually hyper fixated on gender roles. You cut some cake or pop some balloons during a pretty normal family party. Sex chromosomes/genitals are one of the only unique things you really learn about the baby before they're here that isn't generally considered bad news. I guess we could have height percentile parties?

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I might guess with such a party you really reinforce everyone's image of the baby's sex and they might be less accepting if the person comes out as a different gender further down the line? Idk

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Doesn't really matter. The moment the people hear it's male or female, determines how people will treat the baby. Put a baby boy in pink and don't tell people, and people will talk to him like they would to a girl.

Whether or not people accept the small chance that the kid turns out transgender, depends on their personal views. I doubt a gebder reveal party is significant. Besides, it's a party for the parents to be. Not the baby.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 26 points 16 hours ago

Only if the professor comes out of the cake like a stripper

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 55 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (5 children)

gender reveal parties, but a pendant shows up and explains it's meant to be a sex reveal party, but due to the more risque use of the word sex, and the ambigious uses of the word gender, communication about the motive of such things are difficult, and a feeding ground for pendants, people who have been marginalised, and oppressors.

I also don't know where I'm going with this. I'm not sure what my next task should be and I'm letting my mind percolate.

[–] Blahaj_Blast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 18 hours ago

It really is a genital reveal party... Never thought about it that way. Thanks!

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Pedant here, use an Oxford comma.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

oxford deez nuts.

fixed it anyway.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Was it an opal pendant, or perhaps a cameo?

Also, I prefer French press over percolate.

The time of the French press has passed. It's time for the percolator ( 16 years ago anyway).

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ambiguous usage of the word is one of the reasons oppressors have such outdated and undereducated views. The less ambiguity the easier it can be explained to the common folk.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The fun bit is that the word gender was pulled from linguistics into sociology exactly to try to make a less ambiguous situation.

It literally went "what if we talked about people having gender like the French talk about objects?” Much like people, a table is feminine in French regardless of if it has a penis or not.

Later, people decided to use gender as a synonym for sex and complain about using the word gender in a way that's ambiguous with sex.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

a table is feminine in French regardless of if it has a penis or not.

Which most tables in France do, of course.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Gender has been conflated with human sex from the fifteenth century, but I like your explanation of the sociological application.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Who invited the streaker to the gender reveal party?

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 8 points 19 hours ago

Me. The last one was boring. And the one before that started a huge fire. Figured nudity was safer.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Saying gender is binary is like saying there are only two types of apples, red and green.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There are two types of apples: Red Delicious and edible

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Perfect, case closed.

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There are two types of apples, red apples and non-red apples. D'ya see? Everything in the universe either is a banana or it is not, all is binary.

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Quantum physics would like a word

[–] introvertcatto@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 14 hours ago

Quantum physics doesn't exist, it is invented by physics professors to sell you more quants

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 9 points 16 hours ago

Something is in a quantum superposition state or it isn't, absolute binariness.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

chess/similar games/sports :

Women

Open

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago

You know what it'll be yet?

Yes, they'll be a wage slave.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

i don't see the point they are trying to make, of course it's a social concept, that's why it's a social gathering. that's like going to a party for a doctoral degree and tell them its a social construct, like yeah so?

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you understand that it's a social construct then you must understand that gender reveal parties are crepy af.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

Exactly, just have a single celebration on the birthday and be done with it. Why so obsessed about the genitals of an unborn child.

[–] moshtradamus666@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure op was just trying to be funny

[–] azantis@ani.social 2 points 12 hours ago

Successfully failed

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 9 points 19 hours ago

What's the point of a gender reveal party if not an excuse to use high explosives? There's no fun if something isn't being blown up in some way or form.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 18 hours ago

Let them organize their own gender reveal party when they are old enough to decide

load more comments
view more: next ›