this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
164 points (98.2% liked)

World News

32946 readers
1699 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] calabast@lemm.ee 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Open page. Look for the word "Boeing". Find it almost instantly. Be surprised.

Wait, not that last one.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

It's a 15 year old plane, at that point it's more about the airline maintenance program and pilots rather than who made it.

15 years is nothing and it's probably the plane of theseus at that point

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

an average commercial plane is easily used for 20 years, and depending on the model can go for nearly twice as long.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wasn't the problem with the blown put door for example that the official Boeing maintenance contractors just didn't fix it right? Or was that not "maintenance" but rather "retrofitting"?

I honestly don't quite remember.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

it wasn't factory installed properly... with enough bolts.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They're saying there was a bird strike as they were coming in to land. Boeing may not be a factor on this one.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not what article is saying. Plane was ordered to a runway to avoid bird strikes. Landing gear failed to fully come down. Pilot did declare mayday 2 minutes before touching down, so seems to have had the opportunity to abort landing, or jettison fuel, which would not normally be full enough on landing to burn everyone.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Fair enough - bear in mind that I posted 6 hours ahead of you, and I was getting info from a BBC live feed, not the posted article.

Regardless, I think we can agree that this is a horrendous tragedy and hopefully a full and accurate explanation can be found.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do birds take out planes?

I remember watching modern marvels and they were showing jet engines being tested by firing frozen chickens into them and they didn't even blink.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I don't know, just reporting what was being said.

If enough (large) birds in flight got into the engines maybe it causes a fire? I don't know though.

[–] Varcour@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bird strike took out the landing gear?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I don't know, just reporting what was being said.

If enough (large) birds in flight got into the engines maybe it causes a fire? I don't know though.

I saw a suggestion that the pilots may have been too distracted by other issues to put down the gear.

However, better to wait for a proper investigation.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Headline was altered to 85 dead.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

177 now, and likely to be 179. Two survivors (both are crew members), everyone else dead. Horrible.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

I kept checking back and the number kept climbing, what a nightmare, those poor people.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)