The puzzle is
"Dietary fructose supports tumour growth in vivo but fructose is not efficiently metabolized by cancer cells in vitro"
"As expected, we saw extensive metabolism of glucose in all of the experiments as represented by 13 C enrichment in lactate. To the contrary, we observed minimal metabolism of the fructose label in all of the cell lines analysed. "
Cancer cells thrive on glucose, but not fructose, yet fructose intake directly yields cancer cell growth. Puzzle deepens.
I'm probably getting the details wrong: Ketohexokinase levels are low in most cancer cells, but the liver (when exposed to fructose) will express LPCs which then the cancer cells convert into phosphatidylcholines... basically this is a pathway for fructose to feed cancer cells (indirectly with the help of the liver)
I'm not sure what LPC means - liver progenitor cell perhaps?