this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
679 points (97.7% liked)

News

23600 readers
4431 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago

Any CEO (actually, any rich person- the ticket the more this applies) that doesn't donate obscene amounts to good (good as in "would probably be hated by MAGA" or "politically neutral") charities can be "acceptably put down".

Even more so if they are actively causing direct harm to their customers/clients.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 223 points 1 day ago (8 children)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 108 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People aren't exactly gonna tell a random stranger and probable Fed that they support murder even if it's really based

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's not illegal to say you believe Brian Robert Thompson deserved to die. Hell, you could, perfectly legally, file paperwork to hold a parade in Luigi's honor, right through the heart of DC. It's illegal to make death threats, but it's perfectly legal to express support for someone being killed.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

With the incoming administration, I don't want to be on record as saying that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

I wonder how the terrorism charge affects things. Are people going to stop saying they support him out of fear or disgust? Will other people (and/or the government) go after people that say they support him because they can claim they’re supporting a terrorist? Will people become less affected by the word “terrorist” because it’s being applied in this way?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

More than that I bet. Much more.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 13 hours ago

They're sharing such a low number to make people think it's not supported by the vast majority

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago (11 children)

It’s a wake up call, but it’s not really going to change anything. You want universal healthcare? We need a general strike. Shut everything down for a month and demand it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 104 points 1 day ago (6 children)
[–] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 1 day ago (13 children)

When I was young, I wouldn't have found it acceptable. It doesn't matter how badly you're treated, you need to find a peaceful way to resist. It's something drilled into my and my peers' skulls since I can remember.

After seeing little progress (but mostly worsening) with polite requests and peaceful protests, I really can't figure out how it can be unacceptable.

A lot of those kids probably just haven't gained that wisdom yet.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fact that politicians and executives consider this a “shock” is part of the problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

It’s not shocking if you’ve had to deal with any sort of healthcare in this god forsaken shithole of a country.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago

That's actually a lower number than expected

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I doubt I’m "young" but I find it acceptable. I’m only shocked it doesn’t happen more. These people making insane amounts of money off the suffering of the working class have been getting away with too much for too long.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

It's shocking in the sense young people are the ones least effected by our shit Healthcare system since they tend to be the most healthy, and have less interaction with it.

You'd expect the middle aged and older with chronic illnesses would be the most supportive of Luigi, but they have Stockholm syndrome from living under this shitty system their whole life. This is also reinforced by the cable news they watch telling them how tragic it was that a man with a wife and kids was murdered.

Meanwhile, young people are just laughing at memes and tiktoks of how hot and based he is.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 3 points 13 hours ago

I think if my mother's heart condition gets worse and she needs some kind of treatment that gets denied by insurance and thus she decides not to go through with it and dies because of it that you could consider that me having interaction with the system.

A lot of times for younger people, it isn't direct personal experience that radicalizes us, but the effect a system has on people we care about.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Room for improvement. Modest.

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The generation whose future was stolen by greedy, sociopathic billionaires doesn’t care if they get killed. Fetch my fainting couch!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago

Americans have been trained to wish on the CEO the negative things that those CEOs have caused.

Game CEO cancels or ruins an anticipated game? Wish on to them that something they value gets canceled.

Car company CEO makes cars more expensive? Wish upon them financial trouble.

Social media CEO invades your privacy? Wish on them someone to track their plane wherever it flies.

But there exists a subset of companies where death is the outcome of a bad CEO, and the end consequence of encouraging an eye for an eye is what we just saw. Perhaps if a company can decide whether you live or die, the government should play some role in it. Then at least voters will at least have a stake in the governance.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›