this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
347 points (90.8% liked)

Lord Of The Rings Memes

302 readers
360 users here now

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aoife@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Whoa whoa whoa mad max 1 is the best of the three. Sure, the sequels have crazier worldbuilding and fancier visuals but the first is tight, well shot, and tells a good story well.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Since no one here is talking about the Jurassic Park trilogy, I'll go ahead and say my hot take. JP3 is way better than 2. And obviously the originals are all miles ahead of the Jurassic Worlds.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I just watched the first one again and it's still a pretty good movie.

[–] cardboardchris@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I totally forgot Blade is a trilogy

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Blade 3 is... not good.

That's the one where Wesley Snipes was throwing a bit of a tantrum and refused to open his eyes for a scene, so they had to use CGI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

A lot of sequels aren't as good because the original director and writer (and maybe other staff) aren't involved. The original staff may have had a vision for the one movie, and when it's completed, they're not interested in making another one. So the studio that owns the copyright hands it to some newbies so they can get experience and do a low-budget cash-grab sequel.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Bro. Have you seen Fellowship of the Ring? It’s 3 hours of “Hey, could you schedule a meeting so we could nail down our deliverables and figure out a timeline?” And 30 minutes of “good meeting, everyone.”

[–] ochi_chernye@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

Interesting choice not to include the Hobbit movies! I'd probably go 1>2>3, but all those bars would be appropriately hobbit-sized (sans ent-draught).

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Matrix is great all the way through. The problem is that a lot of people didn't understand the story. There's a good explainer on YouTube by Looper.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Eh, the subtext in 2 and 3 is neat but the first movie is by far the best. It sets up a premise and concludes it beautifully and doesn't get too big for its britches. I still enjoy some of the over the top moments from 2 and 3 but there's definitely a leap and I'm not sure the pay off is as good as the first film.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I agree they're better than this says, but the first is also the best, by a moderate margin. The other two get a lot of shit that isn't deserved.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

Nice try... cant trick me into studying trilo-ology.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I would rank them similar to matrix on chart. Liked the 3rd matrix more than "listed" though.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›