That seems unreasonably optimistic.
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
218 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19241 readers
2269 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The pessimism comes in when you look at the way these are voting.
"....but I still gone vote for Trump, because I hate brown people more than I want insurance."
No one wants insurance. They want healthcare.
I agree, but don't think RFKJr is the right man for the job.
The guy couldn't even be the right guy to work at McDonalds. It amazes me we have so many people in politics that could literally work nowhere else. They are essentially unemployable. These are our representatives...
Doubling our police budget to assist in the protection of health insurance management supply lines.
Government Responsibility
This subtle language choice is revealing. Start talking egalitarian political reform and all of a sudden "the Government" and "the People" are two different things: As if they are made up of, by, and for two different kinds of people.
Medicare will be touched. Let's not be naïve.
That said, I think a more interesting observation is that neither major political candidate ran with healthcare as a major issue. It clearly is.
The problem is, people understand so little that they vote for the people who will do the opposite of what they want. Either that or their hatred of other people eclipses their desire to live in a well-run country.
If only voters actually felt that way too.
If only we didn't have two right wing parties and a first past the post system.
If only we had the option of politicians who saw it that way.
The key thing for the incoming fascist regime is that they don't have to dismantle or make a big show of taking away people's healthcare, they just have to do smaller things to allow it to "fail" and then blame [current demonized group].
This is what they have been doing to education for years, and people complain about the system and not the people behind its purposeful sabotage.
It seems like everyone knows the problem, but no one knows why the problem is.
I know too many people who voted for Trump because they're "against billionaires.", failing to understand he's like the definitve caricature of billionaires.
I'm not sure if @Rapidcreek@lemmy.world meant this with their subtitle, but this percentage is too low to foment change but maybe will keep our barely functional but better than nothing current systems. Hopefully we can surpass that historical 69% number.
Nice
Well, I didn't catch that but OK 🫣
If there is anything Congress critters hate it is voting against a rising tide. It's not good for your reelection chances. The popular opinion on health care is a rising tide.
Good point. I will be working to raise a variety of tides!
If there is anything Congress critters hate it is voting against a rising tide.
The only thing they hate more is voting against moneyed interests.