this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
101 points (95.5% liked)

World News

32372 readers
956 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 hours ago

This is a peaceful path to global conquest. It is warmongering posture that promotes this workaround, and enslaving people to domestic tech oligarchy is an inherently negative consequence of warmongering. A world at war means AI/tech helping war and disinformation instead of making work/life more productive.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

But at what cost

[–] modulus@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Mmm, China perfidiously stealing the hard-earned talent of Western engineers? I know just the solution! They should build an anti-communist self-defence wall:

We no longer wanted to stand by passively and see how doctors, engineers, and skilled workers were induced by refined methods unworthy of the dignity of man to give up their secure existence in the GDR and work in West Germany or West Berlin. These and other manipulations cost the GDR annual losses amounting to 3.5 thousand million marks.

Some fine historical irony. Of course, given the way the university system works in places like the US, there's not even a good argument that this imposes costs on the public, who trains personnel only for them to leave and benefit some other state.

Maybe this is what Trump's wall is for.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

trains personnel only for them to leave and benefit some other state.

The entire country of Canada may feel triggered for the last 30 years at this comment.

I mean, all the doctors and nerds come back, but it takes a decade. Are you saying we get a border wall too, and Trump is gonna pay for it ?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 hours ago

Maybe this is what Trump’s wall is for.

There is a video of thin Mexican worker slipping between the bars (wall had to be see through for some reason) from one side of the border to the other. Obviously wall is meant to keep fat Americans trapped inside America.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why would they say thousand million instead of billion?

[–] modulus@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

At a guess, it's following older British norms, whereby a billion is what it is in other European languages (a million million) and a thousand million is a thousand million or, more pretentiously, a milliard. You'd have to ask the authors though.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

That's interesting. Thanks

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Such disgustingly deliberate word choice when China hasn't dropped bombs in, what, 60 years? The bombardment is happening in Gaza, not the fucking tech sector

[–] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

Ok but hear me out

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Based. The west has long relied on international brain drain (caused by imperial wars and neo-colonialism) to accumulate the "best and the brightest" and put a stranglehold on the tertiary/quaternary sectors. It's amusing to see the shoe on the other foot, especially after the western tech giants have worked so hard to suppress tech worker wages.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago

In fact, the West gobbling up skilled labor is a factor of imperialism and underdevelopment. Labor is the superior of capital, so the loss of a skilled engineer is always worse than whatever remittances they might return home.

[–] roux@hexbear.net 37 points 1 day ago

China is Bombarding Tech Talent With Job Offers.

But at what cost? catgirl-hiss

[–] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those perfidious Asiatics, offering competitive salaries to experienced engineers! Very anti-competitive. I know what we should do - we can quadruple down on harassing researchers and professionals with Chinese origins. Heck, anyone vaguely Asian will do.

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I found this line very funny:

State funding for Chinese companies enables them to offer salaries beyond what Western companies can pay.

Source?

it-is-known

ASML made €8 billion in net income in 2023. TSMC, $30 billion (not Western, but mentioned in the same breath). I'm sure they could scrounge a few coins from under the couch cushions to match salaries if they wanted to.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

But if they offered higher salaries, how would shareholders afford to buy their third yacht?

[–] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

So true, but also y’all did the Chips Act and some of the most heavy handed protectionism seen this century. The fuck you talking about

[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Damn, guess they'll have to introduce laws to improve transparency in hiring /s

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 1 day ago

Microsoft, Apple and Google all collectively shed one single tear as their concerns for their multi-billion dollar profits. For the Execs that is.

[–] Feline@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago (5 children)

As Western governments make it harder for China to access sensitive technologies—a trend expected to continue under the administration of President-elect Donald Trump—many Chinese companies are trying to get ahead by luring away top engineers in areas such as advanced semiconductors and artificial intelligence.

Hopefully the wsj made up the part about AI. They would do more harm to China than good

[–] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 16 hours ago

From what I know, AI is used heavily in China's supply chain management and logistics. This sector being so critical, you can imagine the amount of testing that occurred before being integrated to a level where it began to produce a positive return on investment. Capitalists don't care to invest in this testing themselves and pass that duty onto the consumer. This is why in the west, instead of AI solving real problems, we get the automated slop producing factories that pump massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere.

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Chinese capitalists are just as prone to bullshit as western ones. Chinese government might reign it in but they are slow to react.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

Slow, sure. But when they do, it's usually a very final punishment. Puts other oligarchs on notice.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

It depends on what they mean by "AI"

It's a shitty marketing buzzword so it can mean anything from algorithmic logic to LLMs. Not all "AI" requires it's own nuclear power plant and a Great Lake to operate.

[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago

AI has plenty of good uses. Its just capitalism that finds the shittiest ways for them to be possibly used.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 day ago

I'm not talented enough to get poached 😢

[–] blame@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wish China would offer to triple my pay but I don't speak any chinese languages so they probably won't.

[–] facow@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

know of any good free resources out there?

[–] mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just let me work remote, thanks.

[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

For 3x the money! Sign me up but I would need a pretty bad ass contract to jumpship!

[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

From what I've read about working at Chinese tech companies, you will not get to work remotely. In fact, you will be required to work in an office for 10 hrs a day instead of coming and going as you please.

Just look at the TSMC factory in AZ as an example. Taiwanese work expectations are not very compatible with how top US talent wants to work.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

They're a big believer in 996, so 9am to 9pm, six days a week. Sadly, this is creeping into western tech too, but is commonplace in China.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

taiwan is china, its just that its occupied by us-backed libs rn.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 2 hours ago

I think the people living there disagree with you...

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago

They should bombard me with job offers

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

heyy send some of those bombs my way!|

Oh no! Won't someone think of the executives? Anyways.

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Didn't see any specifics around hours in the article though.

Is it twice the pay for twice the working hours? 996 or whatever they call it?

[–] passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Several companies like TikTok still work similar to this. Culturally, I doubt it'll stop any time soon

[–] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

If you're a top engineer (or any similar senior position) for a western company, you ain't working 40 hr/week. 50-70 hours a week is going to be the norm for that type of position in the west as well.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›