this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
120 points (95.5% liked)

Privacy

31876 readers
621 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can I please just get a car, instead of a rolling computer / infotainment / privacy nightmare?

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Wow, this is wildly unacceptable. Why in the hell would a car company need the user's immigration status? Or genetic information? Or fucking sexual activity?! I hope somebody sues these asshole companies.

[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Im really curious as to how a nissan gathers details about sexual activity. I mean teslas have interior cameras that use image recognition to confirm that your eyes are on the road for safety, The data verifiably never leaves the car and is never saved but “Collecting data on facial expressions” seems like kind of a weird and dishonest spin on that.

“Volkswagen’s cars reportedly know if you’re fastening your seatbelt” Is that just the occupancy sensor and seat belt sensor letting you know you forgot to fasten your seatbelt? or that one of your passengers is unbuckled? I wouldn’t consider that an invasion of privacy.

Collecting the data is not whats important when theres safety implications. Its what’s done with the data thats important and potentially privacy invading. Nissan does have the term about selling your data in writing, thats probably more of a legal blanket statement to cover them in the future for some super weird edge case.

Generally speaking privacy invasions are more aligned with free services

[–] Niiru@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry I don’t see any indication that this was from the interior camera, only the exterior cameras recording public spaces (dashcam)

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

From the article you linked:

In its Customer Privacy Notice, Tesla explains that if a customer agrees to share data, “your vehicle may collect the data and make it available to Tesla for analysis. This analysis helps Tesla improve its products, features, and diagnose problems quicker.” It also states that the data may include “short video clips or images,” but isn’t linked to a customer’s account or vehicle identification number, “and does not identify you personally.”

So (1) it is opt-in specifically, and (2) that article is taking about the external cameras.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The data verifiably never leaves the car and is never saved but

Sorry but how.. how do you verify this?
Is all of the Tesla car software suite open source? Are the schematics of the car, at least about all the cabling and technical components publicly available? Or was it just the Tesla PR department saying that they of course don't do that because they value your privacy so, so much?

Tesla cares are big, remote controllable black boxes, that can receive software updates at any moment without you even knowing.

[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Teslas have a WiFi and cellular modem. You can’t tell what exactly its sending or receiving because encryption, but uploading video to Tesla’s servers means a much larger data set than just telemetry. It is very easy to see if something like that is coming across.

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/en_us/GUID-EDAD116F-3C73-40FA-A861-68112FF7961F.html

[–] zagaberoo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

No need to exfiltrate the whole video stream: extract features and call them 'telemetry'.

[–] ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

about the tesla interior camera. no it does not. at least not in a very useful way. it tries to maybe detect that you probably are not distracted. one way to make it give up is wearing sunglasses.

[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 1 points 1 year ago

I wear sunglasses to drive all the time. If I look down at the touchscreen to use the nav it beeps at me and tells me to keep my eyes on the road. It will even detect if you have a phone in your hand. Where do you see that it doesn’t monitor in any useful way? Would you prefer that people not be reminded of distracted driving?

[–] Icalasari@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Sounds like there'd be a business in making dumb cars. Because holy fuck

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As an environmentalist this really bothers me. I want a new electric car which is better for the planet. I no longer think I can. I would probably have to pick up an older model. What a joke. I'm too angry about the way the world is progressing, our privacy is eroded faster that we can take steps to mitigate.

[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The best alternative would probably be, if feasible at all, a bike coupled with public transport. For our privacy as well as for the environment.

[–] chayleaf@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

tbf public transport can be very bad for privacy, depending on the politics of your country... granted, with facial and other recognition nowhere is safe

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I wish Tesla kept selling the “$35k Model 3” that was stripped down and had no cameras or autopilot. Essentially just an electric vehicle with no bells and whistles.

[–] YaDong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Ronno@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

No, the issue is not cars, the issue is governments allowing, or actively pushing these companies to mass surveillance on a wide scale. This goes beyond the car. Children born today will never experience Privacy.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm still wondering how they'd be able to collect race, genetic, sexual, etc. information, some of those things don't seem at all possible, but they're somehow listed anyway, which is doubly scary

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No actual idea, but I think there's a considerable amount of cars that are filled with cams and mics "for your convenience".
Including the (afaik) mandatory SOS button, that has a mic and a cellular connection.

[–] Ronno@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

This indeed, it is quite easy to scan video feeds of the interior camera and determine these characteristics, as well as link them to social media scraping to find your preferences. Scary AF

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's reasonable to explain many things for well equipped cars, but the genetic information??

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's a good question. Maybe the steering wheel absorbs and tests the driver's sweat? Lol this sounds overboard, and almost certainly it is, but I can't think of anything that would warrant that part

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha, yep, it would also be unreasonably expensive, but who knows?
Maybe they get that by correlating your profile with data of some entity that does have it, because it was collected and shared by a health company you might used services from. No amount of tinfoil hats will protect us

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

We need tinfoil gloves!

[–] glasgitarrewelt@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

I love my bike so much. Hopefully there is a future where I can just sell the stupid car without drawbacks.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Wow, that's completely fucked. Normally I would be surprised, but deaddove.gif

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

... are RC cars and surveillance machines. For all places you go, who probably never agreed to it.

[–] DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Good thing my family owns a owner type jeep that dosent connect to the internet