this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
1045 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12376 readers
317 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Did she stumble into a coherent thought?

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

The sad thing is, this will never happen. We’re in the throw-away timeline where all the bad stuff happens.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 5 points 5 days ago

I don't think that's the threat she thinks it is...

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I... agree... with MTG?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago

Ok.

Let's start with Gaetz.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

He went on to address the allegations against him, saying he deems them "worth less than nothing." "Under our laws, a man is considered innocent until proven guilty. If AG Garland (an unprincipled D-bag) could have secured a conviction against Gaetz, he would have, but he knew he could not. Case closed," Musk added.

This probably a biggest eason why Garland was the absolute stupidest choice for AG Biden could have made.

Obama nominated him for SC, because he knew no one would get a hearing, it literally didn't matter.

Obama didn't really want Garland on the SC, because it would be a wasted appointment compared to what Republicans seat in the bench.

But Biden's old ass didn't understand what was happening. So he actually appointed Garland as AG, and seemed to honestly have expected Garland to do anything.

And trump supporters never know what's happening, they knew the name from before Trump took office as Obama's SC pick. Assumed that meant Garland was hyper partisan, ignored everything he did say, and when no one was held accountable, used it as "proof" that there was no evidence

The only people that was ever happy with Garland as AG, was Garland and neo liberals who also rarely understand what's happening.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Fucking do it.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Oh let’s! Please let’s do that.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Best idea she's ever had

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

She is just as gross and opportunist. They will find the one example that isn't one of theirs and use it for the next 20 years. I'm all for it just never trust the snake.

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 4 points 5 days ago

Never thought we'd agree on anything

[–] donescobar@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

How about hell yes?

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Uh huh .. go on..

[–] Ele7en7@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago
[–] Maeve@midwest.social 3 points 5 days ago

Don't stop at Republicans! Do Democrats and Independents, and every other party who have and are serving!

[–] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I know she's just bluffing but god I wish they'd do that

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›