this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
87 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59345 readers
5951 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 6 points 4 hours ago

The only legitimate use I can think of for AI in podcasting might be for realtime translations so people who don’t speak the language of the podcaster can still listen. Even that makes me feel weird, but I think it could be done ethically-ish. Same deal for voice-cloning, I think that would be super-useful for realtime translations, so listeners still kinda hear the host’s voice, even translated. But every other use I can think of is ripe for abuse and won’t result in quality content.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago

ITT: People who did not read the article and just shot from the hip

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 30 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Spotify's plans to take money from subscribers but never pay a fucking dime to anyone else , ever.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

The perfect corporation as no employee, no product, pays no taxes, and grows infinitely. Capitalism at work

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 7 points 8 hours ago

Cutting out everyone but the middleman

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Finally, they can make a robo-Rogan that can radicalise young men at a fraction of the cost

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

It’s like the Electric Monk but for fascist indoctrination

[–] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Move to Tidal if you value artists

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If they weren't so focused on Europe/the Americas, sure.

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Move to piracy and donate to the artists directly to better support the artist, if that is an option.

Tidal still take a cut from the artists revenue.

[–] quirzle@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'll pitch Bandcamp as an option, especially if/when they bring back Bandcamp Fridays next year (where they don't take a cut on specific days). Not everyone's on it, but it's generally a reasonable, legal option for those artists that are.

[–] precarious_primes@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Instead of paying $10/month for a music subscription, I buy 10-15 albums a year, mostly on bandcamp. I self-host Navidrome so I can stream my music on my devices.

Win win

[–] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

Some artists don’t have donation links, so Tidal is the best bet

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Fuck Jack Dorsey too though, and its lacking a few bells ad whistles last time I checked.

[–] Tarogar@feddit.org 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Right. AI music? Hopefully not, it is likely going to lead to generic slop that may infringe on other artists copyright. AI Podcasts? OH GOD NO! factual news isn't working with AI and you guys think that opinions with AI is a good idea? Are you crazy?

Now music recommendations? That might just work given that algorithms are already doing a decent job at presenting new ( to the particular user, not by actual age) music that the user may enjoy. The question really is if that is actually better than what we already have. And there is only one way to find out, which is by testing it and then being honest about it.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 hours ago

Now music recommendations? That might just work given that algorithms are already doing a decent job at presenting new ( to the particular user, not by actual age) music that the user may enjoy

In my experience they really suck..."oh, you liked that song from this artist? let me just push a shitload that is categorised in the same basic genre without actually considered the specific track you liked"

It's so ridiculously generic in its suggestions it's useless. So yeah, AI can almost only do a better job at this than currently.

[–] painfulasterisk1@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

When Spotify will unveil that the company will be run by AI and make the job of the CEO, CTO, etc, obsolete? When will the board of directors be replaced by AI? This is the news I want to hear.

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That seems like a quick way to get me to cancel my Spotify subscription.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

AI generated ~~music~~ slop

FTFY

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There is already AI music which people create and upload.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

yes but if Spotify uses its own GenAI music, they don't have to pay anyone else when someone listens to it.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The closest I want to AI music is ENUNUNU or Diffsinger, which still require a human(s) to actually put in effort for a good quality song.

But they don't care because there's less profit in letting humans be creative.

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml -2 points 12 hours ago

söderström. So, just asking, is he a meat fetishist too?