this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
32 points (59.5% liked)

World News

32288 readers
1130 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blake 124 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (117 children)

Clearly everyone should just let China do whatever they want to avoid war, if we appease them by expanding their territorial claims and avoiding conflict then surely everything will be fine. The politics of appeasement has historically been very successful.

Edit: Stop replying please, I don’t want to waste any more time arguing with y’all.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (76 children)

It is the USA that has been the target of appeasement. Every expansion, every death squad, every war crime, every black site, every assassination, every war of aggression, every single time the world appeases the USA.

If you think the USA is appeasing China, your head is screwed on backwards. I know it's a common trope for abusers to feel offended and attacked when their victims standup for themselves, and I know you probably stand with the victims and see through the abusers' bullshit. You need to do that with the USA.

Abu Ghraib - appeased.
Nord Stream 2 - appeased.
Solemaini - appeased.
Iraq - appeased.
Iraq 2 - appeased.
Vietnam - appeased.
Laos - appeased.
Cambodia - appeased.
Korea - appeased.
Hiroshima - appeased.
Nagasaki - appeased.
Guantanamo - appeased.
Libya - appeased.
Syria - appeased.
StuxNet - appeased.
Pulling out of nuclear treaties - appeased.
Refusing to be accountable to ICC - appeased.
Refusing to sign landmine treaty - appeased.
Agent Orange - appeased.
Napalm - appeased.
White phosphorus - appeased.
Depleted Uranium - appeased.
Yugoslavia - appeased.
Afghanistan - appeased.
School of the Americas - appeased.
Wiretapping the entire US civilian population - appeased.
Wiretapping every embassy through Siemens supply chain attack - appeased.
NATO expansion - appeased.
Economic shock therapy kills millions - appeased.
Training terrorists - appeased.
Airlifting terrorists into other countries - appeased.
Environmental devastation - appeased.
Sending expired vaccines - appeased.
Refusing to send vaccines - appeased.
Refusing to follow the predefined protocol for sharing vaccine research - appeased.
Iranian regime change - appeased.
Color revolutions - appeased.
Extracting trillions from Africa - appeased.
Child separation - appeased.
Toddlers in solitary confinement - appeased.
Forced hysterectomies - appeased.
Collective punishment of civilians - appeased.
Support for Israeli apartheid - appeased.
Iran-Contra - appeased.
Fast and Furious - appeased.
CIA drug trafficking - appeased.
Haitian assassination - appeased.
Bolivia - appeased.
Nicaragua - appeased.
Pinochet - appeased.

I can keep going if you want.

[–] CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also "appeasement" is a made up post-hoc explanation for the western Allies' actions before WW2, blaming the supposed naivete or lack of spine of the leaders for simply allowing the Nazis to make expansionist moves uncontested, rather than it being an intentional policy to get out of their way and try to direct them eastwards against the Soviet Union.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Absolute banger of a comment

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] judgeholden@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

westerners are really the most propagandized people in the world

[–] Blake 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] judgeholden@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm certainly not a Brit who's now very concerned about other countries making 'territorial claims'.

[–] Blake 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You gonna answer the question?

[–] judgeholden@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm Iranian, I sure wish you were around to fight for my country's sovereignty when the UK and US decided to lay waste to it

[–] Blake 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In your comment below, you shared an image of a United States passport. So you’re from the US. And how long have you lived there?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm Iranian, I sure wish you were around to fight for my country's sovereignty when the UK and US decided to lay waste to it

Interesting, you mentioned that you're from the US here.

https://hexbear.net/comment/3834104

You're just a first worlder LARPing as a revolutionary.

[–] judgeholden@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Blake 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is a US passport. Born in Iran, moved there as a child is my bet. Probably from a wealthy family, usually Iranians don’t get to move to the US unless they’re wealthy. Unless you won a green card lottery or something.

[–] judgeholden@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

smuglord

damn you guys are just doubling and tripling down on being extremely wrong

[–] Blake 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I was wrong, you’d be indignant, not acting smug. Your response is all the proof I need to know that I was right on the money. Pun intended.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

The 21st century indo-pacific is not a comparable issue to 20th century Central Europe. Also appeasement wasn't even the complete disaster casual observers like to make it out to be (who still won the war after all?) but that's beside the point here. Taiwan is not some defenseless independent country being threatened by the reincarnation of Hitler calling for world domination. It's a part of China that broke away in an ideological civil war that China wants back. Even the US state department acknowledges this fact, yet they still believe it is very important that they protect one part of China from another part of China and extend their civil war which should have ended for good decades ago. This is not an act of peace or charity, this is creating a conflict situation, with Taiwan right in the center of any potential explosion.

See, the US doesn't care about these concerns is because the real reason America is in Taiwan is so they can use it as a strategic base for operations to oppose and weaken the PRC, a "West Berlin of Asia" so to say. And somehow, liberals and social democratic opportunists have deluded themselves into believing that stationing the most powerful naval fleet in history (US 7th Fleet) to permanently do 'freedom of navigation exercises' (armed provocations) in Chinese coastal waters is the "moderate" solution to this conflict. And I suppose we'll just have to keep the navy there forever right? Or until the PRC finally collapses? (I'm still waiting lol)

I say we should cut a deal with the PRC, let them have Loser Island in exchange for mediating other border disputes with their neighbors. A majority of Taiwanese citizens want more integration with China, and they're still their largest trading partner. While immediate annexation wouldn't be popular, a gradual process of integration would be best for the entire region. It would allow the two biggest military powers to step down their aggressive actions against each other, end the period of Taiwanese citizens being used as a geopolitical pawn, and provide a solid diplomatic framework to settle future disputes in the region (as this would be a massive rapprochement in Sino-American relations) This wouldn't even weaken American national security (which is what everyone hates about 'appeasement') since it's, you know, an occupied imperialist outpost on the other side of the world's largest ocean, not even in America's hemisphere.

Of course this option would be totally unacceptable for the American imperialist apparatus, they would never be willing to lose such an important base in the Pacific (just ignore that they would still have Japan, Guam, Philippines, etc). So what's going to happen instead is that the US is eventually going to get distracted and entangled in some other imperialist mess, because they can't recognize their empire is hopelessly overextended, and China will just take Taiwan when they think the balance of power is in their favor. This would be the worse thing to happen: a chaotic breakdown of the region instead of a negotiated reordering. There will be decades of bitterness and calls for mass violence. Maybe it will also escalate and some ships get sunk and the nukes fly and oh well its World War 3. Beware those who call diplomacy 'appeasement' in the post-atomic age, they seek your death.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

I say we should cut a deal with the PRC, let them have Loser Island

shock, gasp, Hexbear user thinks Taiwan should surrender to China.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

just let China do whatever they want

No one is saying this, but go off.

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

The politics of appeasement has historically been very successful.

the one singular lesson liberals were able to tease out from all their history classes on ww2

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

feddit.uk

lmao is this literally a lemmy instance for British feds? this has to be some reverse psychology from the Ml5

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (109 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (24 children)

China creates conflict with all its neighbours and tries to steal their territorial waters.

China threatens the existence of an independent Taiwan.

China commits literal genocide against Uyghurs

And it’s the US starting shit this time? Give me a fucking break imperialist sympathisers.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] blazera@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (30 children)

Taiwan is a sovereign nation

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›