Gaming

2520 readers

25 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!

Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

No NSFW content

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:

Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.

If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Demigodrick@lemmy.zip

Sami@lemmy.zip

Here are the patents Nintendo and the Pokémon Company are suing Palworld about, according to Pocketpair (www.rockpapershotgun.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by ZippyBot@lemmy.zip to c/gaming@lemmy.zip

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

If those are the only 3 items they're suing over, in an American court of law it'd be a slam dunk for PocketPair. Theres so much prior art, open use, and poor definitions involved the patents would be quickly invalidated.

But I'm not aware of the nuance of Japanese court, only that they tend to protect IP even more strongly than US courts.

Edit: fuck it, I haven't been very interested so far, but I'm buying a copy of palworld today. Software patents are a broken system and Nintendo deserves every bit of fight given to them.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They literally patented riding creatures lol they could sue fucking red dead redemption, it is complete insanity

[–] Clasm@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 weeks ago

Monster Hunter as well.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

I went and bought several Pokemon-Like games after this whole debacle started. Made sure to get the physical versions, too.

[–] Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know about the legality of if either, but it seems so broken for them to have submitted these patent applications AFTER the game released, getting them accepted a few months later. That's fucking stupid, right?

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

Theres so much prior art, open use, and poor definitions involved the patents would be quickly invalidated.

There might be. We don't know what the patents actually say yet. Without a proper translation of the patents from somebody who understands Japanese legislative texts, all we have to go off of is the machine-translation, which I'm sure is not capturing all the details of the patent.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Am I reading the patent info right? The patents were applied after palworld came out?