this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
114 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5460 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh no! Not a scolding! That's one step away from a strongly worded letter!

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Scolds is the new slams.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is the fucking consolation prize??

Put this bitch in jail.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

…for maybe two months. Dude is laughing his ass off.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I presume Julie is trying to string things out until February when he expects to be pardoned?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you can get a pardon on a civil judgement. You probably can be pardoned for any criminal contempt cases that arise from disobeying a civil judgement.

That could at least keep you out of jail, but federal judges have a federal Marshal service they can order around to repo assets if need be.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You describe how things work in 2024. I’m pretty sure we’re going to see Trump stomping hard on state’s rights pretty early in 2025.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Here's what I want say about that.

We've got a defense system against fascism here in the US of A called checks and balances, and another one called minority rights. And I think reasonable people should lean on those as hard as we can for as long as they remain viable options.

Fascism is something that comes to pass because people allow it to happen. Even now it is not yet inevitable. For example, Proud Boys and the other paramilitaries are not unified and they don't control the streets. The best course of action is to resist at every opportunity.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Fun fact, the guard rails basically got blown the fuck out last time. Trump has figured out that he can do whatever the fuck he wants and let courts figure out whether it's legal or not, and NOW all he has to do is appeal to the Supreme Court and they'll uphold whatever bullshit he's trying to do.

[–] 0000011110110111i@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fascism is something that comes to pass because people allow it to happen.

Fascism is actually something that comes to pass because people vote fascists into office. The Nazis were actually voted into office in Germany. Trump was very candid about what he’ll do once he gets into office and still won a very resounding victory.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The democratic election was just one step in a long multi step process. This was true for the Nazis, and it is true for Trump.

To actually do all the stuff he wants to do, Trump will require people to cooperate with him. Do not give any cooperation from your end.

If he does something that's illegal, litigate it in court. If he wants to pass an enabling act, filibuster that s***. If he wants to ban books, circumvent those book bans. Do not give up a single inch of ground willingly. For every person that is rounded up into a camp, some other fairly normal person had to choose to do that. Don't. Trump can't run these camps all by himself.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately, it looks like Trump has no shortage of cooperation.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

if you had checks and balances, your president elect would be in prison. instead we now know that even leading an insurrection has no checks.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is surely just LAWFARE, and donnie needs to lock up (if they are lucky - it might be even worse than mere prison for them) anyone that picked on poor little Julie! I've had it up to here with the dirty liberals thinking the law should apply to Republicans!