this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
639 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

10970 readers
3681 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blaze@lemmy.cafe 2 points 6 days ago
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 105 points 1 week ago

¡Nobody expects the Spanish notation!

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fuck I thought that was an absolute factorial.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Aren’t all factorials absolute factorials?

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Introducing, the signed factorial: ¡n! = n × -(n-1) × (n-2) x -(n-3) x ... x (-1)^(n-2)(2) ×(-1)^(n-1)(1)

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We did it Lemmy!

Where’s our Nobel prize.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's no Nobel price for mathematics, but I can accept the one for peace instead.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I heard biology branches out.

[–] kittehx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'd prefer an alternative definition that starts with the base case ¡0! = 1, and then for n > 0 we define ¡n! = n * -¡(n-1)!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How are you going to flip the signs though?

[–] kittehx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

oop there was a real stupid typo where I forgot the minus sign lmao

it's fixed now

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

It's the same calculation but you also take a shot of vodka for all integers less than n but greater than 0

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Spanish notation makes the parentheses around n-k obsolete, clearly saving one symbol in some formulas is worth introducing a new one in others.

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Why not both?
n! / k! ¡n-k!

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't need brackets in the Spanish notation. ¡{That's the whole point}!

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Whyd you use curly brackets then?

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Because they become invisible in LaTeX

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

¿{Did I thought}?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Spanish mathematician! Is this for real?

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago