Linuxsucks

210 readers

130 users here now

Rules:

FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic (that is LINUXSUCKS!).
No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you *it's ok to report rule violations

founded 2 months ago

MODERATORS

madthumbs@lemmy.world

-5

I thought this was a Windows disease (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 month ago by bleistift2@sopuli.xyz to c/linuxsucks@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

off is an alias to poweroff

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

The response is very clear. Anoyhet user is tunning a process which blocks unelevated shutdown. You can override it with the command privided in the response. Like mentioned in a peer comment, sudo shutdown now would resuly in the immediate shutdown of the system, ignoring any interrupts. If anything else fails, interrupt power. It should start fine.

It could be a process you are running under a different user (safe), which demands you to shut it down cleanly.

Linux provides the mechanics to prevent the problem you're angry about.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know why it's inhibiting you here, but Linux is a multi-user OS (meaning multiple users can be logged in at the same time), so it definitely makes sense for it to have a mechanism like that. If another user is in the middle of a long-running operation, it might be very bad to forcibly cancel that...

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Sure, but in this case it’s my own process that’s preventing shutdown. And it’s the cinnamon session of all things.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure using sudo or being root helps with that. Other than that: never have I ever seen that. Pretty sure this is a shit distribution.

[–] smb@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

i'ld say this has nothing to do with linux (as linux is the kernel and what sucks there is your distributions choice of how things are handled), and i guess this is just one of tens of thousands of poisoned systemd crappy design "decisions". i went from systemd away for the same crap why i went away from windows. there are tons of very "interesting" similarities between systemd and windows and "it sucks" is just one of them. use a linux distro without systemd and stop complaining about linux when systemd is what actually fails for you. ;-)