this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
36 points (89.1% liked)

Opensource

1427 readers
41 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] refalo@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Eh.. I understand exactly where they're coming from. If you're trying to make money with a product then this is something that can happen. You can argue all day long that it's no longer technically "open source", but IMO for 99% of usecases (anything that's not a Confluence integration), it still is... even still non-copyleft.

Of course there will still be people that argue open source is antithetical to capitalism in general... but not everyone agrees with you.

[–] 8hob@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, I agree. Too many people are overly obsessed with the exact definition of "Open Source". But come on, this now "proprietary" software is only tiny bit different from an open source software and shares almost no similarity with a typical proprietary software.

And more importantly, this new license is even arguably better than an open core model.