this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
623 points (95.5% liked)

Data is Beautiful

4930 readers
489 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's been trending this way for years, but seeing it graphed out like this is shocking.

What do you think are the effects of this drastic change?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I first dated online in 1999, and the first woman I dated I ended up marrying and having two kids with, though we divorced in 2017.

I still date online these days, and I prefer it. It allows me to know a little about a person before I waste any time chatting them up, and the things I need to know are things they generally put on their profile. Things like their sexuality (since I am non-binary), their political leaning (I'm socialist), their relationship orientation (I'm polyamorous), whether our values match...you know...important shit. And those early conversations before we ever meet in person are low-key enough that I feel more comfortable with them IRL, something that helps me as an autistic person.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Huh. I never knew that people really do meet at bars for more than just a one night stand.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Look at the date of the latest piece of data, and you have your answer

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'm kind of surprised that College has always been low

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Surely this graph is wrong? In 1974 couples used to meet while kung fu fighting. A lot of research tends to prove it.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's hard to get a headcount when people are fast as lightning.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Q: "Why didn't you get in touch with that guy you met at the kung fu fight?"

A: "In fact, he was a little bit frightening..."

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

wait, everybody was kung fu fighting?

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Kudos to that handful of people who met online in the fucking 80s. Talk about meeting over niche interests.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I'm personally thrilled not to be bound by the recommendations of my friends or family. Or work?! Gross!

People: "Oh hey there Digital Frontier, looking forward to the opportunity" The Permanently Online: "Get out of my swamp!"

[–] whelk@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

I just like that it looks like a cuttlefish.

[–] XaiwahBlue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago

Meeting online seems like the best way to me. Better to date people you have stuff in common with rather than just picking your partners through circumstance.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I like the idea of dating apps, but I don't like the implementation or at least how they end up being used where the focus is entirely on visual attraction. I don't particularly think or care about looks; I'm attracted to personality. Most people have blank profiles and just a lot of pictures, so I either have to decide to not like a majority of profiles or like everything just to maybe get a chance to talk to someone.

And it doesn't help having BPD and not really having a solid identity to tell people who I am in a single block of limited characters. So when nobody even communicates when you actually match, it just makes the whole thing seem pointless and stupid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I met my partner because my ex broke into their house with a friend to get their bong back. My partner and their ex, walked in on my friend and my ex, and obviously freaked out. I have no idea why they decided to be friends, but as a result, I've been in a relationship for 7 years now lmao. If anyone is wondering how that happened, we were poly, but now we're monogamous. Also, both of our ex'es are transitioning now, and I couldn't be happier for them. That's just a random coincidence. One male, one female. Also, it's really weird being in a straight relationship after being in a queer relationship for years. Sorry for the tangent.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The sad thing is, that amazing story would be listed as just "through friends" on the survey.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Grade school is funny. That's K-6, right? Like 6-12 year olds?

Church is a conspicuous absence on this chart, I guess nobody really meets anyone there?

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think "grade school" would count K-12, but I could be wrong. I was surprised about the church thing too, especially since the data goes back far enough that it should be significant. I wonder if it's falling under another umbrella.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whoever made the chart presumably thought "grade school" meant K-12, which it does not.

Easy mistake though, Fight Club got a particularly lewd line past both the censors and the actress by relying on that misunderstanding

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

It's so sad to see real life vanishing

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Fuck that is sobering to see. I mean you knew it was trending in that direction but to see it so starkly and so drastically. Damn.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›