this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
1159 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
4786 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's good that I use Firefox and will continue to be ad free then, eh?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Google, fuck you and your ads too:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Browsers with in built adblocker or system wide AdGuard.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Or Firefox?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's going to be internet explorer era again. I wonder which will replace chrome in the future.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Doesn't uBlock Origin already have a Manifest V3 version of the extension?

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

uBO Lite.

Not my jam, lacks the power of the original.

[–] Lila_Uraraka@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Yes, though the devs don’t even like it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] quant@leminal.space 11 points 1 month ago

If only banks and government websites moved their asses and stopped mentioning Internet Explorer for one more time...

[–] vincentpants@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah but Mozilla just turned into an ad company. Hard fork time.

[–] TooManyGames@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not really. Ads aren't gonna dissappear, with Mozillas tech, they'd at least be more private than what Google will implement.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›