this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
933 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How convenient, right after they bribed their captive regulator to slash reimbursement rates for home solar, they force everyone to pay time of use electric rates.

PG&E is a criminal conspiracy.

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Let's not forget how will only buy electricity back at a variable yet, sell it at a static rate and keep the profit.

Also up charging a tax on selling electricity back into the grid for "use of their equipment", which understandable i get but again c'mon.

The realistic progress needing to be done here is a battery storage solution as power needed during intense solar days is effectively 0% in California nowadays. We need to store that energy and use it during night but then it eats into PG&Es profits and we can't have that can we?

Everything done under the guise of "progress" is helping a corporation somewhere.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sounds to me like the best way to progress at this point would be to nationalize the utility and focus it on power generation and management rather than profit.

And IMO similar could be said about many things.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

We've used piped gas into homes since the 1820s. Good riddance.

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I know it’s not the point of the article but seeing a person in a trench/ditch with no reinforcement and no slope makes me so nervous.

That’s a bad way to go if it collapses.

https://www.osha.gov/trenching-excavation

The more I look at it the more it may not be quite 5 feet requiring it. Here’s hoping so.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like there are a lot of systemic problems with the electrical grid in California that need to be addressed before projects like this happen.

As far as I can tell there has never been any sort of reckoning among management at California utilities for the decades of underinvestment and mismanagement.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

PG&E literally went bankrupt because they didn't inspect a powerline, and the cast-iron hooks holding it up swung slowly back and forth over a century until they wore through, dropping a live powerline to the ground, sparking a fire, and causing towns to burn down.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah so unless there was a complete overhaul that involved firing multiple layers of management maybe putting more load on the grid isn't the best idea.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The bankruptcy took out a big chunk of their executive team, and induced a huge investment in grid upgrades. So completely reasonable actually.