this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
100 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1438 readers
45 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maol@awful.systems 17 points 2 months ago

oh "environmentally sustainable AI", that's like clean coal isn't it.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

Microsoft when they can spend more money on Sam Altman:

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ai, at it again

also, Microsoft at it again

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

why.. did you.. screenshot.. the post.. with a bunch of text blacked out.. ?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because it still reads correctly with the blacked out bits, it just reads more honestly about how little Microsoft gives a fuck about hydrocarbons, climate, change, or any future that isn't "Microsoft owns everything."


Wrote how Microsoft committed to carbon reduction goals - except all their AI compute would completely blow all their numbers.

Then there's Microsoft's customers, they're marketing AI to the fossil fuel companies as a "powerful tool for finding and developing new oil and gas reserves and maximizing their production."

Microsoft thinks fossil fuels are a market opportunity of $35 billion to $75 billion, especially as the oil and gas industry is turning to Microsoft for guidance.

It's OK -- the problems being caused by AI will be fixed with more AI.

[–] Rob200@lemmy.autism.place 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good question, first I didn't screenshot the entire post, the purpose was it's to narrow it down to the point that I wanted to highlight, and it's more likely to be a fair use if I commentat it and contain less of the content. For the full content you should view the actual article.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 2 months ago

author here, feel free to summarise!