UK Politics

3072 readers

110 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

flamingos

UK Treasury refuses to disclose key details of £22bn fiscal ‘black hole’ (www.ft.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by mannycalavera to c/uk_politics

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive link for when your finances have been sucked off by a black hole.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good to see the FT continuing to absolutely destroy their credibility:

The response from the Treasury’s information rights unit said details would be published respecting agreed timelines “to allow the relevant officials time to complete the preparation of the information to ensure it is accurate and correct prior to publication”.

[...]

A spokesperson added the Treasury intends to provide more details of the overspending, either at the Budget or in separate spending releases.

Not exactly sure how this can be considered a refusal....hmmmmm.

[–] flamingos 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They've been spouting out this '£22b black hole' line for weeks, but now they suddenly need time to make sure the figures are accurate?

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

A full itemised breakdown is a different level of rigor than a "to the closest billion, what's going on?" request made civil servants as part of an incoming government. Given the statements made by the OBR themselves the idea that 22bn is inaccurate or false is pure cope.

Also, the FT not actually linking to their FOI request means you cannot see exactly what they requested, and a high level of detail could well lead to other disclosure problems (eg if overspend occurs in front line military).

[–] UKFilmNerd 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure of the negatives, but I've heard that a one-off wealth tax, that is taxing the top 1% earners a single 1% would bring in £25bn to the treasury. Problem solved, £3bn left over.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 1 month ago

Not one off. Permanent!

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://archive.ph/E2cJ3

[–] mannycalavera 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks. I have no idea why it's not working for me. Now not even my link works for me 😔