this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
389 points (94.7% liked)

solarpunk memes

2806 readers
456 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not givin' up

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 143 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Relevant and Related:

You don't simply stop "doing the right thing" just because you're not "winning."

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I got the original meme but I don’t understand this. Can someone ELI5?

Are they suggesting that its sad that “you” would think people only deserve food water and shelter?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It could because its very US centric.

A lot of people in the US argue that the poor don't deserve anything, any lack of money is a moral failing, and they don't deserve any kind of help.

They have that attitude because capitalism has gaslit them into believing the "pull yourself up by your own bootstraps" lie to justify their position that someone who is thirsty should be allowed to die of thirst, someone who is hungry should be allowed to die of hunger, and someone homeless should be allowed to die of exposure.

The person in the meme is arguing against those people, saying all humans actually do all deserve food, water, and shelter. All things US conservatives would happily deny someone who was suffering. The cruelty is the point.

I hope this helps!

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh wow okay. Arguing against a point I didn’t know needed arguing against. Thanks.

That is indeed sad as fuck. And as someone disabled to the point I’m unable to work, also scary as fuck.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And as someone disabled to the point I’m unable to work, also scary as fuck.

My partner is disabled as well, so yeah, for real, I hear you. It's fucked and scary as hell. Technically I am, too, I guess, because I have cancer, but I'm in the US so people really don't give a fuck because I'm in my 40's and don't sufficiently look like I have cancer, so I'm expected to just keep working... It's super fun having to hide it in job interviews so I'm not straight rejected because they'll think I'll miss too much work so they just won't fucking hire me, and fat chance I can ever prove such discrimination...

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A lot of people in the US argue that the poor don’t deserve anything, any lack of money is a moral failing, and they don’t deserve any kind of help.

A bit of a reduction. It's not that being poor is a moral failing, but there is a mindset that if you don't have a job, it's your fault, and that if you have a job but are still poor, you're probably wasting money on drugs or something. It's not so much "they're poor because they're a bad person so I shouldn't help them" as "if I help them then they won't help themselves." Which is an easy position to hold if you don't consider how little the low-hanging jobs can pay, how much rent costs, how much food costs when you can't home-cook it, and how hard it is to get a job when you don't have a number, address, shower, or clean clothes.

And then there's a second group that thinks "Well, we have systems in place. There are homeless shelters somewhere, so they should be going there instead of begging on the streets." And they can be right, but you should probably do some research on said homeless shelters before you take that stance, in case it's too far away to walk, understaffed/underfunded, or poorly managed.

It's easy to think the poor don't need your help if you don't think on it too much, and to be fair, not everyone has the bandwidth and energy to be thinking on that. But at the end of the day, we have poor people, so those with means should be doing what they can to help.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

and to be fair, not everyone has the bandwidth and energy to be thinking on that

Incredibly astute and also incredibly sad because it's a very purposeful design of our society to have everyone so broken and tired by our world that they simply don't have the energy to recognize that other people are suffering as well. I am constantly trying to remind myself that everyone around me is struggling as hard as I am, and it's not anyone's fault they don't have all the time in the world for me. How could they?? They're hanging by a thread just like I am!

Which is part of why I say "The cruelty is the point." You're very correct that I was being reductive, but there's definitely a class (mostly the capitalist class, people who actually have capital.) of people for whom it simply boils down to a desire for power for the sake of power. An enjoyment of expressing power over others, and making them squirm. Those are the people who are designing society to be this way, to break every worker so badly they cannot stand up for one another. They smirk knowing we're so broken we can't stand up to save ourselves. They simply get off on hurting others.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 43 points 1 month ago

We failed to prevent climate change, but it can get a lot worse. It is a bit like claiming we should stop build houses, because we have not prevented homelessness.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago

Climate change is not a binary. It might be too late for the best case scenario but we can still make it much less bad.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bro stop posting leaked footage from Dune: Messiah

[–] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Aged Paul looks much more attractive

[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago

that's a really gutsy thing to say

[–] QuentinQuiver@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago

Never gonna give you up Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around And desert you.

Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a liiiiie And hurt you

We've known each other... for so long...

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The actual climate scientists have been increasingly saying their models show there’s no point to even trying while capitalism still exists, and get continuously worse every time they add recent data to the model,

…but I support, commend, and unironically respect your commitment OP. One person can absolutely make a difference to their local ecosystem assuming they have enough money and land.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Okay well then where's the problem? If there's no point in trying to fight climate change while capitalism exists, then end capitalism. I don't understand where we disagree.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh shit, I forgot I have this magical capitalism destroying sword laying around. Let me just cut capitalism in half real quick (the long way so it's harder to put back together) and then we can get back to eating all the pets like Marx intended.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable. So did the divine right of kings. Any human power can be resisted and changed by human beings. Resistance and change often begin in art, and very often in our art, the art of words.”

― Ursula K. Le Guin

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it like the magical feudalism destroying sword?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's very much like that. Few have the strength to wield it and they are often derided as psychopaths by their peers and those in power

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You are utterly powerless to stop this, even at your most self actualized, mobile, and focused you are fundamentally incapable of changing what needs to be changed.

There really isn't hope, people who think there is unfortunately don't understand how the universe works. Your attitude towards the end is irrelevant ( unfortunately ) and we are surely on our way towards extinction.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You are utterly powerless to stop this, even at your most self actualized, mobile, and focused you are fundamentally incapable of changing what needs to be changed.

This is flat out wrong.

You're missing the point, because your scale is off. I'm not trying to change the planet. I'm trying to change my city and neighborhood. I'm not trying to hold back the tides. I'm trying to teach the next generation the resiliency to survive a long road to something better.

Those goals are totally in my reach. I can't save billions, but I can definitely save dozens. Perhaps hundreds over the next century. And if enough of us do that, collectively we CAN save billions.

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We don't have a century, we barely have decades, your scale is off, and honestly I don't want to be right, it would be amazing to be wrong about this, but I feel like I know with absolute certainty that we've really just got a few decades max before the planet is unrecognizable in significant ways you are probably thinking won't happen until centuries.

It'll be too hot for roads, solar panels, and conventional air flight much sooner than people realize. The first springs that trees fail to reproduce will honestly probably not be noticed, it won't happen everywhere, all at once, but eventually the lifecycle of much of the plant life will be so misaligned that you'll see the failures of entire areas of plant life, but by that point too, you'll probably be more aware of how silent it is outside except for cars.

We're already at the point that localized heatwaves are killing a huge, like unimaginably huge amount of land animals, and ocean acidification is preventing shelled creatures from forming or maintaining shells, all while coral reefs bleach, and fish die off due to changes in oxygenation.

I wish this sobering reality wasn't happening right now, but it is.

[–] GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

people who think there is unfortunately don't understand how the universe works.

But you do? Right.

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I am absolutely insinuating that yes, when it comes to the biosphere and climate change the situation is irreversible and catastrophic and the level of certainty I have is unshakeable.